If someone zap me, I will zap you.
这是介绍Nostr网络系列文章中的第四篇，在这一篇中介绍了什么是NIP-05、如何设置它以及顺带介绍了NIP标准。希望对刚了解Nostr协议的朋友们有所帮助。也欢迎找我交流。
https://mirror.xyz/hoodrh.eth/ibbUHYt1kAOi4TABpNdv4zVaL4lRGpcWWJnL2auFvpU
好的，正在写面向新用户的文章:如何设置NIP-05以及Nip标准介绍
人们通过zap来表达对彼此的赞赏，有效社交和价值网络将得以诞生。
想更新Nostr系列的文章，结果VPN老是连不上，Mirror打不开就很难受。
但是也真的显示了Nostr网络的优势所在，完全不用VPN就可以实现全球连接。
The economic activity of the Nostr network will be driven by the fact that more and more people will start to realize the value of "I like what he says = I want to give him ZAP". is driven.
begin new game @cowdle #game
#[2]
The concept of the "tragedy of the commons" originated in an article written by ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968 about a story that took place in the 19th century. The concept of "tragedy of the commons" originated in an article written by ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968 about a story that took place in the 19th century when there was overgrazing on public lands. At the time, overgrazing was occurring on the commons because farmers could not trust anyone else to keep their livestock grazing within reasonable limits. This story has long served as a cautionary tale about the need for government to control people's demand for public resources (in the case of farmers, land is a public resource). Since then, "commons" has been used to describe all kinds of tangible or intangible "spaces" of public value that need to be protected. This is why free speech and copyright-free content on the Internet is often said to fall under the category of "creative commons" and should be protected by law, contract, and community activism.
“公地悲剧”概念源于生态学家加瑞特·哈丁（Garrett Hardin）1968年写的一篇文章，这篇文章讲述了发生在19世纪的一个故事。当时公共的土地上存在过度放牧 “公地悲剧”概念源于生态学家加瑞特·哈丁（Garrett Hardin）1968年写的一篇文章，这篇文章讲述了发生在19世纪的一个故事。当时公共的土地上存在过度放牧的现象，这是因为农民都无法相信其他人会将各自牲畜的食草量控制在合理范围内。一直以来，这个故事都作为警世寓言，表明政府需要控制人们对公共资源的需求（在农民的例子中，土地就是公共资源）。从那时开始，“公地”就用来描述各种需要受保护的、具有公共价值的有形或无形的“空间”。这也是为何人们常说互联网上的自由言论及无版权限制的内容属于一种“创意公地”（creative commons）的范畴，并认为应该由法律、合约及社区行动主义保护起来。
"Token Economics". This concept suggests that we can build into these "programmable" currencies mechanisms that allow communities to achieve common goals. Tokens might help us solve the problem of the Tragedy of the Commons. In other words, it could be a very important idea.
Good night 🐣, dear Nostr
Users pay attention to the relay subscriptions of other users, and the relay network will grow like the vines of the tropical rainforest, and infinite value will emerge on top of a decentralized facility.
用户通过关注其他用户订阅的relay，relay网络会像热带雨林的藤蔓一般生长，一个去中心化的设施之上将会涌现出无限的价值。
yes. The more people here gather, the more prosperous Nostr will be, and we would like to see a forest become thicker.
一些具有自由主义思想的加密货币爱好者，希望生活在一个完全由区块链规则处理的世界里，并从对政府的依赖中解脱出来。他们总是喜欢引用哈佛大学教授劳伦斯·莱斯格（Lawrence Lessig）说的“代码即法律”这句话。一些人对这句话做了过度解读。劳伦斯·莱斯格从未说过软件代码可以代替现实法律（即所有的争议都能由自动化机器解决），他只是说代码限制了计算机部件的行为，因此代码在一定程度上有法律的特质。若认为代码可以代替法律，则难免是过分贬低了法律的作用。假如法律仅仅是一系列指令和规则的集合，那么我们或许真的能在电脑上用算法协作，仲裁并执行我们所有的数字化交易活动。但法律的意义远非如此简单，它更为深刻、广泛。已故的瑞士心理学家卡尔·荣格（Carl Jung）曾提出“集体无意识”（collective unconscious）的理论，这个理论认为我们的相处之道是继承各自的前人，并在数千年来不断地演化。若要提出“什么是法律”这样哲学性的问题，则可以引出不同的答案，但如果你深入研究这个概念，你就会发现越来越难将法律从卡尔·荣格所说的“集体无意识”中分割出来。我们其实无法将这样的东西简单地浓缩成计算机代码。
Twitter's secret algorithm blinds us to the fact that our communities are cut off into distant others.
The Nostr network will create a more open, web-like, and extensible social field through subscriptions to delays everywhere.
The Nostr network will create a more open, web-like, and extensible social field through subscriptions to delays everywhere.