Avatar
Katja Lutz
caf0b76c5efcc2498bd77ab23c9a3f4c64b13f79a9cd7633ce08fd556f8c4a43
Altruistic anarchist, down-to-earth, independent hobby astronaut 🧑‍🚀 and amazingly lively, passionate web developer in the stand against the technocrats. Also founder of nitropage.org, the FOSS visual website editor.

That title sounds like all software used by the government has to be open source, which is simply not the case 😌.

My lightning address will be created this week 🥴, my todolist surely failed to show it last week 😇🤞

BREAKING: A whistleblower leaked the full uncensored german RKI protocol files related to the Covid crisis. The files show that the "scientists" bowed to political preasure.

Download it here:

Main: https://mega.nz/file/AWdgSZxC#ZcnntY4tSxiuytZgVY7bVPlOr1iivYPu5b1Gj7UWlXw

Extra files:

https://mega.nz/file/dbc1zbyD#qhI5ls4RGyCf3A1wFpoz3y8BuMuex0TxdJoo1dVmYFY

This has to be heard, recognized and admitted by the mainstream!

Original tweet:

https://x.com/aya_velazquez/status/1815567564694515876

Both of you got a new fan 😃👏! Love the music by nostr:npub1jw63d0ykym7rpd3n6cme7p3rghc77se3ql8drg78p55c5xe3npdscrh29m. The covid crisis drove a lot of us freedom seekers into art it seems, I also had a music project back in the day 😁.

Replying to Avatar Leo Fernevak

💯

First we need to define what a free market means. John Locke laid the foundation in 1690 in his Two Treatises of Government, by deducing that every person is born free, own themselves and the fruits of their labor.

This effectively renders slavery impossible - when we agree that in order to protect our own property rights, we also cannot own another person and the fruits of their labor.

Following first principles, we can then deduce from Locke's groundwork that coercion is wrong, theft is a crime and that abuse and exploitation are abominable, since every person owns themselves and must be engaged with informed consent.

A few principles that would characterize a genuine free market:

1. No central banks

2. No government moneyprinting

3. Competition in money

4. Full property rights for all

5. Free speech

6. No AML/KYC regulations

A free market is the emergent process of adult free agency and voluntary exchange where the use of force and coercion is absent.

A free market is a process of decentralized decisionmaking, where free agents interact and must convince one another toward interactions that leave both parties better off. As Aristotle noted, a trade will only occur when both parties are in agreement. We can deduce from this that if there is no consent there is no free market.

Back to John Locke, who laid the philosophical foundation for the anti-slavery movement in 1690.

Since you own yourself, your mind, body and the fruits of your labor, you must also own the monetary reward for your work.

If you own the income from your work, then you must be free to spend and transact as you deem fit, without needing a permission. I.e. - a free market.

A third party permission can be withdrawn and render your money unusable, which is why it is incompatible with the principle of owning the fruits of your labor. We can deduce from this that AML regulations are, ipso facto, an abolition of property rights.

For a free market to work there must be competition in money, so that individuals can choose the form of money and that their income cannot be stolen via moneyprinting/inflation. As we have already established, theft is a violation of property rights which leaves us with the conclusion that moneyprinting is incompatible with a free market.

Since owning yourself also means the liberty to express yourself - without harming the individual rights of others - speech must be free. Boundaries to free speech involve for example incitement toward physically harming other individuals, i.e. abolishing their individual rights.

A free market also depends on free speech since consumers must be able to boycot bad products and services as well as report and warn the public of incompetence, lacking service or quality, harmful practices, poor management and mistreatment of staff. Only via free communication can a market be free and individual decisionmaking can be informed by facts of reality and the ethical judgement of individuals voting with their wallets and feet.

Without free speech there can be no error-correction. From a programming perspective this is a deep can of worms: when errors compound without fixing, a complex code will inevitably spiral out of hand.

Not only does this lead to harmful outcomes but it also leads to completely unpredictable results that will undermine any attempt to objectively analyze data and draw informed conclusions. As the effects of un-fixed errors snowball, a system becomes increasingly unstable and destructive, ripe for the risks of a deepening dictatorship.

Overview of the logical outcomes of central planning, central banks and moneyprinting:

1. Governments + central banks create money from nothing.

2. The newly created money enters the economy via government spending, as well as from fractional reserve lending, and flow into real estate, assets, commodities, etc causing bubbles exploited by insiders and cantillionaires.

3. Price inflation, costs of living and house prices continuously go up as a result of moneyprintin, taxes, regulatioms and subsidies, while government debt increase.

4. Workers need higher wages due to the increasing costs of living.

5. Small businesses can't afford to pay higher wages plus increased costs of rent and must either close down, sell their business or move further away from city centers, thus losing revenue and allowing large corporations to eat up their market share.

6. Large corporations are incentivized to merge with government and acclimatize their protocols toward government ideology in order to access subsidies, tax reductions and to escape costly regulations. The more the regulations, the more government and corporations can be expected to become entangled and merged. This is how the process of corporatism is worsened, year by year.

7. The government uses major corporations for surveillance and ideological indoctrination against its employees and may pressure corporations to demand unsolicited medical treatment and/or injections for its staff.

We saw this during Covid when, in many workplaces, an experimental mRNA was announced to be required in order to keep your job. This was an effect of government regulations and threats of costs and fines imposed for non-compliance.

As the free market competition is strangled by the government rigging the markets, employees have increasing difficulties finding jobs that don't involve government surveillance, ideological conformity and mandatory medical procedures.

8. Workers are replaced by robots as inflation escalates and the costs of living drive up wages, while companies are incentivized to invest in machinery and robots rather than costly human staff. Unions threatening with strikes makes unionized employees less reliable and more risky for production and expanded regulations impose additonal costs for workers. The government can basically increase costly regulations to infinity in order to corporatise the market and centrally plan it via regulatory nudges.

9. As workers are replaced by robots, large segments of the population become dependent on government tax money redistribution + moneyprinting. We can expect that the conditions involved for receiving a UBI check will involve unpaid labor and/or compliance with government ideology.

As a result of ideological obedience, error-correction is undermined and without critical voices opposing the regulations the complex fabric of societal code spirals downward toward unrestricted central planning.

This is the 1984 dystopia we want to avoid, plagued by central planning tools such as CBDCs, carbon allowances, ESG, DEI, energy rationing, censorship, surveillance and social credit scores.

Bitcoin is necessary to empower individual liberties, property rights, competition, free speech and enable the process of free markets and decentralized decisionmaking (individual sovereign judgement) to restore liberties and counteract the increasing centralization of power.

Bitcoin is anti-1984 technology.

The free market spirit is 100% incompatible with authoritarians. Problem is that they make up the majority. We would have no war, no colonization, no slavery, no legalized theft (taxes), no compulsory military service and no damned seatbelt enforcement, if the majority would say NO. Instead they say "YES, more!".

Du erinnerst mich gerade daran, endlich mal vollständig auf mein De-Googled Smartphone umzusteigen wo ich das Wallet of Satoshi seit Wochen einrichten wollte 🥴. *Auf Todoliste für diese Woche aufschreib*

Sneakpeak of the focalpoint image cropping feature and API that will come with the next #Nitropage version 🥳.

https://video.nostr.build/680aa278136388236f718df31443d39194e63c785f5dc1c0254032442f871947.mp4

That was me yesterday 😂

This lets you show that your projects and works of art were made by a human.

The inventor's thoughts:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qjPAWy_2FL0

Logo:

https://humanmademark.com

In a perfect world

...everybody has money, yet nobody needs it

...everybody has privacy, yet nobody has to veil

...and everybody is armed, yet nobody shoots

GM my dear #pinballstr friends

Privacy Ranked:

I’m going to rank these least private to most, and explain why on each step.

Discord

Why: Discord is as bad as it gets. It's not only completely unencrypted, but they maliciously sell your data and have such huge restrictions on VPN IPs and SMS VoIP verification.

SMS

Why: It’s going naked over the phone lines, but isn't heavily sold in such a rotten way as Discord.

VoIP

Why: VoIP is just as horrible as SMS, but separates your real physical location from the cell tower

Telegram

Why: Unlike VoIP, it does have end-to-end encryption, but only on mobile. And with weak encryption that they made up, that hasn’t been properly reviewed [Source: Madaidans of Whonix]

Signal

Why: Telegram has no metadata protection, while as Signal has sealed sender. Signal’s encryption is stronger and more thoroughly peer reviewed. Also Signal has a good legal track record and isn’t strict on crypto VoIP burners like Telegram. Having phone numbers isn't that big a deal if I paid $1 of crypto for a random VoIP burner in Cambodia without restrictions on Tor. Btw, my Signal # is Cambodian: +855 68 504 905

Matrix

Why: Tucker Carlson’s Signal was hacked. Also, academic papers have shown Signal’s sealed sender has flaws. If you self-host Matrix, that's much more control than trusting Amazon's AWS, which is a CIA contractor. Many open source projects use Matrix rooms.

Session

Why: Most Matrix users use Matrix.org which is Cloudflare with Gmail verifying the emails. Setting up a Matrix server is more expensive and complex than just opening Session and hitting "create account". Session’s onion routing, non-location based DNS, and decentralization is stronger than Matrix's Cloudflare-dominated network.

SimpleX

Why: Session lacks (by default) rotating keys and multiple identities. You can manually rotate keys using your blockchain name, and manually get multiple accounts at once via enabling it on Linux, but most won’t want to do this just to avoid government domain names (which most SimpleX users use). Session is better for censorship of servers, SimpleX is better for end users being invisible.

Self-hosted Tor XMPP

Why: SimpleX is hiding from servers, but if you control the server, that’s stronger. Even a self-hosted SimpleX server only picks half the conversation. Also, XMPP has a longer proven track record, which is more eyes on the code. Now if you DON'T self-host XMPP, it's way up on the list next to Matrix.

Self-hosted Tor XMPP w/ OTR

Why: OTR nukes the conversation when it’s done. It literally destroys the encryption keys. Game over bro.

Conclusion:

Anything is better than Discord. Now, let's play a game, pick a communication method I did not mention, and you tell me where you think it should rank on the list. Then, we'll discuss.

SimpleX is very nice, but currently lacks rotation and redundancy for the message relays 🙈.

Letting evil people vote for the people who will keep the evil people in check, obviously solves this problem, democrazy baby 😎

Now that Assange is free I really start to wonder, will he join Nostr 🤓?