How did he destroy lives?
You are more aware of corporate reality and more importantly understand its drawbacks. Working hard and getting a job early is the best recipe to become part of the productive class and eventually financially sovereign, instead of turning into a socialist with cognitive diss 😆
Yeah - the government isn't lying about this one and totally not stealing ~$50 million daily 😆
I think your math is off by magnitudes.
If 161 km arc length has an angle of .02527, the supposed full circumference of 40,030 km would never add up to 360°. Omnicalculator's arc length calc for example returns 1.447908° for 161 km.
Multiple online curve calcs return ~6,667 ft for 100 miles (at close to 0 height above sea level), so you really haven't debunked his claims. Why not go to the sea somewhere and try to do an observation instead? A lot of true earthers have been made this way - go prove it's a ball instead of trusting the Nasa/gov priests.
Trying to outscream climate lunatics is pointless, the idea is that their entire premise is false, proving it's yet another lie they will keep repeating. The worst we can do is try to argue and not challenge the lie, thereby repeating it ourselves.
CO2 is life, there's no crisis.
CO2 is destroying countries, comedy gold 😆
Brought to you by npc radio, stay tuned for more pseudo science.
Nasa is another con institution, similar to every other government one. Bringing you the most expensive (hollywood/cgi/photoshop) productions since the 50s.
It actually is this absurd😅
https://x.com/tonyclimate/status/1697473541342634198?s=46&t=-Ks4q52A7vJzQnCci96yHw
Do nostr clients show a preview of xitter urls?

Everybody paying taxes is financing terrorism, so yeah - they ain't wrong.
It's funny how you are 24/7 shilling for bip300 and arguing about its merits and how there's no downside while at the same time believing this.
Sateloons* 😉
Satellites orbiting a ball 24/7 is more sCiENcE fiction nonsense - theorized even before any "space" program. There are however baloons capable of staying up there for months, changing altitude, etc. Nasa is also the biggest consumer of helium. Look up crashed satellites in the south - it's all hanging on 'uuge baloons.
You misspelled hard fork - no drivechain code will be running on my node.
What's the best time of year to see the lunar landing still sitting, preserved, on the moon?
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_1465342671252314371693359220.webp
No lander, but here's some nice-looking cgi from 5668373 trillion light years away. Honestly, it's real 😂
It's not a contest, but a trade-off - if bitcoin was as private as monero it would also be worth as much because nobody would be able to verify the supply. Seems like the market values this feature highly.
You need to read the whitepaper again, mate - you're dreaming of ethirium while shitting on bitcoin with this monero nonsense. The stuff you people go through to not use cj/jm...


