The main problem (not to me but in general) is: improvement of existing code requires the ability to read. "The Chuckcha be not a reader, the Chuckcha be a writer" vibe is now stronger than ever.

Why do you need a separate app to use Nostr web clients on Android as opposed to a normal Vanadium tab?

Ok, that was enough for me to revert to Nozzle. I don't get along with covid-fascists regardless of how FOSS-friendly they are.

I don't see healthcare data anywhere in the app. Marketplace, Live, Community, Chats, Notifications... Did I miss something? Version 0.85.3.

Anyway, please offer something better at the moment. Something that I won't have to decompile.

On Android, I use Amethyst solely because Nozzle plain sucks, and I don't see any FOSS alternatives as of now. I didn't even open that tiktok-like and marketplace tabs a single time until you mentioned them.

I like how OsmAnd developers did. On Google Play, there are two versions: just OsmAnd (free of charge with some map count limitations) and OsmAnd+ (paid, without limitations). On F-Droid, there is OsmAnd~ (free and without limitations). Like, those who don't know about F-Droid and are fine with Google's spyware must pay for their ignorance.

Which ideas are you talking about? This is just an Android Nostr client. Whoever wants to steal its ideas won't have to wait until it becomes open-source. Most liekly, they won't even have to reverse-engineer anything, they will just look at it. It's not a big effort to clone any client if there is enough motivation. Which motivation is here? Insert your own ads or what?

Meanwhile, freedom-loving users are tied to Google dependency or forced to fetch some outdated version from Aurora. Nah, I'll use Amethyst from F-Droid instead.

It is not a problem at all if your business model isn't solidly based on selling thin air and if you are not planning to suddenly rip off your userbase in the future.

This ripoff can be in the shape of Telegram Premium, but it also can be in the shape of Atomic Wallet, if you know what I mean.

Honest and large FOSS projects often offer paid support and other bonuses that don't hamper the trust in the main codebase.

Internet encourages vaults and bunkers instead. If you don't want your tech to be stolen (whatever you mean by this), don't publish it anywhere in the first place.

Besides, reverse engineering is not stealing if it's not done for any profit but just to make sure this is not malware.

If I want to excercise "anti-competitive practices", I'll curb my dignity and launch Google Play. install it from there and export and decompile the apk.

I could have done this from security analysis perspective as well, but the point is, open protocol client should not require users to do that. Stick to twitters and blueskies with that corporastic mentality. Open protocol — open clients and servers. Period.

I switched to spa-to-http because I don't want to interact with neither creepy ass deepstate companies nor with russians.

I visit this place twice a day at most. Don't expect instant responses.

Why not? At least I'd make sure nsec doesn't get sent anywhere.

Yes, because everything is a trojan until proven otherwise.

Where is the source code?

But RC4 is quite fast even on something like 6502 or Z80.

Besides, I wouldn't rely on complex and probably buggy hardware to perform such tasks these days.

Of course it is fast. People even implemented it in QBasic 30 years ago.

I think RC4 is being treated unfairly.

If I post a gigabyte-large file and the only thing you know about it is that it's been encrypted with RC4-drop777, will you be able to crack it?

Those who sell copies of software should accept copies of money.

Hmm. Companies tend to react to any security flaws found in their billing much quicker when they are not just reselling flatrate-bought services.