Lowe’s explains Bidenomics

I decided to see what Agorism is defined as:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agorism

The Agorism philosophy seems to hold many of my positions. I have described that capitalism has both good and bad forms and that the bad forms need to be reined in, without creating new state agencies in the process. The Wikipedia article describes three forms of capitalism from the Agorist POV, ranked from best to worst:

Entrepreneur

Non-statist capitalist

Statist capitalist

The only obvious areas that I have a problem with are how this area of managing civilization also begins to merge with leftist ideals, such as worker empowerment and social equality. The following interview of Roderick Long clarifies that his definitions of ensuring equality do not include equality of assets, but closer to equality of opportunity. He also indicates that only the people, and not the state, can solve these types of corruption problems.

https://en.liberalis.pl/2008/01/04/interview-with-roderick-long/

I recognize that The Great Awakening seems to be teaching the people to push the pendulum away from the state and toward Agorist types of philosophies.

The entire history of humanity involves attempts at trying to create Agorist style approaches, but always get coopted by forces that result in a corrupt state.

A state is required to implement the “perceived human right” of equality of assets, so as long as those competing forces are fully understood and kept in perspective, trying to achieve Agorism is a noble cause, in my opinion.

Equality of assets is not a sustainable human right, but equality of opportunity provides an optimum crucible for long-term benefit to humanity when the results are viewed at the macro level.

nostr:note1ese5fp0rzx3qf5xxlfxxczgkhp3cc08ashyda8al5k6fw3z5h3jq6kxuvf

#MilkIt