Allow me to clarify what I meant by algos: feedback loop plus whatever else goes into the privacy concerns users/former users have voiced.
My primary point: bitcoin is literally built to be the most public thing we've had so far. How is that not against the concerns about privacy and having one's life surveilled?
Everyone has a problem with their privacy being invaded by algos. No one has a problem with Bitcoin (by it's very nature) recording and displaying everything you do with it?
Oh, okay...
โI always say that you could publish my trading rules in the newspaper and no one would follow them."
Richard Dennis
More like remote detonators, specifically.
"Humans are intensely social animals and research suggests mimicry is a critical part of human social interactions. It is intimately tied to relationships, liking, and empathy, functioning both as a signal of rapport and as a tool to generate rapport."
Yeah, I gotta second this. I understand the benefits, but I don't understand how everything being public is a benefit.
Maybe, but sharing it with the world isn't part of nature. You made that part happen. ๐
Here's a thought:
If I hop on my preferred nostr client everyday (several times maybe), and proselytized about Bitcoin being decentralized and rocketing off to the moon. Eventually, I'll be right, and anyone paying attention will think I'm a prophet. It couldn't have anything to do with, oh I don't know... me essentially guessing, on a daily basis, and being lucky enough to say it right before it takes off...
Stop being fucking sheep. ๐
It's as pathological as anything could possibly be.
I don't see much being said about this, while everyone is on here spouting about "de-centralizartion."
Chart says bullish. We shall see.
#truth
What's a guy gotta do to get some benevolent angels to drop off a strings-free investment? #highhighhopes