nostr:note1gx9u8axcy5u2z74ttz6x0eqj52h2xq7mexsdu3rl95tzyxf3649sfja4ge
Thieves
"The two notions--one to regulate things by a committee of control, and the other to let things regulate themselves by the conflict of interests between free men--are diametrically opposed; and the former is corrupting to free institutions, because men who are taught to expect Government inspectors to come and take care of them lose all true education in liberty."
ā William Graham Sumner, What Social Classes Owe to Each Other [1883]
a bit of bitcoin, the easy way: http://azte.co https://video.nostr.build/8bccdd7578a315c1365301f26ae47869e3a3f8df68ea3d504e91b553364cb7bf.mov
I notice the English seem to love the word "bit." At least least they seem to to use it a bit more than Americans do. Given the name "Bitcoin", might that point to Satoshi Nakamoto being an Englishman? š¤š
#asknostr #bitcoin
nostr:note1gxuh3d6acgltw524lvueupl729ftdrk90cfwqs7qmfn7nhyxd94s9e3kyn
Pretty well seems up how I view Trump as well.
"Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his [Jesus'] voiceĀ and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment."
āThe Messiah, Gospel of John (5:28ā29)
#JesusSpeaks #bible #biblestr
He means in the church, though. Because otherwise, you would have to leave the world... (1 Corinthians 5:10)
We still practice the murder of children today, even in our "modern" and "advanced" times, we just call it "abortion," "birth control," "family planning," "a woman's right to choose (death)," and other euphemisms...
āThe one who believes in the Son has eternal life, but the one who rejects the Son will not see life; instead, the wrath of God remains on him.ā
https://ref.ly/Jn3.36 via the Logos Bible Android app.
#biblestr #Jesus #God #bible
Was Calvin a "Calvinist" š
Do you think he would subscribe to the 5 points?
Thomas Jefferson was not an #atheist, and not a fan of #Calvinism either
"I have I can never join Calvin in addressing his god. He was indeed an Atheist, which I can never be; or rather his religion was Daemonism. If ever man worshipped a false god, he did. The being described in his 5 points is not the God whom you and I acknowledge and adore, the Creator and benevolent governor of the world; but a daemon of malignant spirit. It would be more pardonable to believe in no god at all, than to blaspheme him by the atrocious attributes of Calvin. Indeed I think that every Christian sect gives a great handle to #Atheism by their general dogma that, without a revelation, there would not be sufficient proof of the being of a god."
Thomas Jefferson
Letter to John Adams (11 April 1823)
My pastor has a new book out, $2.99 on Kindle. Radical Moses: The Amazing Civil Freedom Built into Ancient Israel. https://a.co/d/8uu7oqb
If you are eager to know more about the goodness of God's law for His people in all ages, you've gotta read this.
"Has God really left it up to us to discover the best way to govern ourselves? Is "trial and error" on a national scale the best we can do as we form our civil governments?
Imagine if God suddenly formed a bunch of people into a nation from scratch one day. Imagine God giving them a structure for their government and a relatively small set of rules and concepts for the purpose of protecting the most vulnerable members of society. It might be worthwhile to study those things.
Of course, that is precisely what happened in the early stages of the biblical narrative. God brought Israel out of Egypt and constituted it as a new nation, regulated by the Law delivered through Moses.
The Law of Moses created a radically free nation. So free, in fact, that modern "liberty lovers" in the West would shy away from it as dangerous and unworkable. If one of these people were suddenly transported back to that situation in Israel, it would seem like the government had disappeared entirely.
Imagine a philosophy that framed a system in which you might go your entire life without ever having to deal with a government official. This is what God gave Israel through Moses. It was a system built on the concept of individual self-government under the commandments of God, with a judiciary that could handle flagrant violations.
And, by "handle" we mean it comes to the aid of victims, procuring their restoration and real justice.
If you're ready to be challenged in the direction of genuine liberty, this short study of the Law of God, the national "constitution" that God made, will do the trick.
Topics include the structure of government in Israel; crimes vs. sins; positive and negative law; the evil of executive government; criminal punishment; victim's rights; slavery; caring for the poor; love of sojourners; and honest money." #faith #bible #christian #biblestr #reformed

Bought it and looking forward to reading it!
It reminds me of a favorite passage of mine in another book, Empire of the Risen Son, Book One by Steve Gregg:
"A common refrain in the Book of Judges reminds us that āIn those days there was no king in Israelāāsometimes adding, āand everyone did what was right in his own eyes.ā In modern preaching, it is common to hear this described as a bad arrangement. āWhen everyone does what is right in his own eyes, there is moral chaosāāso goes the familiar commentary. This is true, when the thing that is ārightā in a manās eyes is contrary to what is ārightā in Godās eyes. However, Israel had the TorahāGodās Lawāto teach them what is right in Godās eyes. It seems that, for most of the period described in Judges, what is right in Godās sight was what was deemed right in the peopleās eyes as well. The period of nearly four centuries was punctuated by relatively brief periods of general rebellion and idolatry, for which God disciplined His people and restored proper order. When the Bible says, āeveryone did what was right in his own eyes,ā the contrast is not between this policy and that of doing what is right in the sight of God. The contrast is between having personal and qualified liberty of conscience, on the one hand, and having an earthly king, on the other, being forced to do what is right in his eyes. As Israelās later history proved, having a human monarch is the more disastrous arrangement of the two. The biblical comment tells us that liberty of personal conscience prevailed, rather than domination by a human (and therefore corrupt) earthly ruler. The former is what God desired for the society of His Kingdomāindividual liberty of conscience, under God. For citizens to do what is right in their own eyes is certainly preferable to them doing what is wrong in their own eyes. According to these verses, the alternative is to have a government under an earthly kingāwhich God saw as undesirable. He found it offensive (bordering on treasonous) when Israel later asked for a change in this arrangement (1 Samuel 8:7). Freedom to follow oneās own conscience in the fear of God is the highest biblical standard. Later in Israelās history, when they actually did have earthly kings, oppressive rulers often interfered with such freedom of conscience (the biblical examples of Ahab and Manasseh come immediately to mindāas do the tyrants of Babylon, Syria and Rome, who governed and oppressed Israel at later times). For everyone to do what is right in his own estimation means to follow the dictates of individual conscience. There is nothing bad about this, so long as oneās conscience is informed by Godās revealed moral norms. This was precisely Yahwehās ideal when He set up and governed His Kingdom in Israel during the period of the judges. Through most of this period, it was quite acceptable, and things went smoothly. It was only on the occasions when Israel disregarded Godās Law and compromised with idolatry that things turned bad. Whenever Israel did stray into idolatry, their True King would step in and discipline them, allowing foreign invaders to overtake and oppress them. When they had learned their lesson, He would likewise bring deliverance in the persons of certain individuals who served as military leaders and judges. These judges served in these emergencies for the remainder of their lives, but, upon their deaths, did not leave their offices to successors. Their passing was not viewed as leaving a vacuum to be filled. There was no permanent family of hereditary leaders, since God was the only permanent governing official. He proved Himself quite capable of keeping, or restoring, order in His Kingdom. Under the oversight of the judges, when there was no earthly king in Israel, the years of Israelās obedience to Yahweh exceeded those during which they strayed by a factor of three to one. This means that Israel was obedient three-quarters of the period when they had no earthly king. Things were far worse, during the later monarchy eraāa period of almost 500 yearsāduring which the kingdom of Judah had very few faithful kings after David, and the northern tribes of Israel had none. The tribal league, prior to the monarchy, served to allow Israel to maintain Yahweh as their only direct Ruler. The obligations laid upon them by Yahweh were simple: they must worship none but Him, doing so in accordance with the Levitical practices, and live harmlessly toward one another. Apart from these things, they were a completely free people. They had previously suffered oppression for hundreds of years under a cruel king in Egypt, but now, under Yahwehās rule, they had become the most liberated people on earth." (Pp. 77-79)
#anarchy
What gave it away as the fake Jack? That must have been before my time.
nostr:note17kqyk89s9rwy9lzjzenj7w7uy7ugzj5kfuzqtzjs4vsf903jvrcq8kv94t
The nazification of America. Americans are currently living through what in the future will be compared to the Nazi Party's takeover of Germany.
How do you KNOW it wasn't him? Are you just figuring the probability is against it being really him? Or did he post something that made it clear it wasn't him?
Is it just me, or does anyone else look FORWARD to government shutdowns? š

"Some folks look at me and see swagger, which in Texas is called 'walking'."
George W. Bush
er.com/embedded/download/9NPZ.gif