Profile: dfa94a58...
My post was changed and not by me, shlomo. Do you speak English ?
Could be. I was not too worried about the deleted post for that reason. My posts that were censored were in a thread started by Peter Todd, I though he may have tampered with them , until I saw 2 of his posts also were censored in the same way. Unless he censored himself. Weird. Bottom line. We need a tamper proof network , otherwise what's the point ? Bitorrent with over 10m nodes probably gives you at least a few tens of thousands of nodes for your posts , out the gate.
See the attached , the post had a "sensitive viewing" cover notification plastered over it. Two posts. Another post was deleted.I didn't do any of that. Don't know how to so that. So, who did it in a "censorship resistant network"
I don't want to go into the network layer and start screwing around with config. Get a proper network layer, like Bitorrent mainline DHT.
?
Well, I got censored. Three times. So there's that. They're patently lying. Which makes it a honeytrap ?
If the amethyst client did the censoring then there's a problem with the protocol. Something stinks here
The client was amethyst. Shouldn't matter if its truly open source. If we can have Sybil attacks then the architecture is garbage.
Nostr. Nostr censored censored me twice and then deleted my complaint. Nostr is going to die. A real decentralised , censorship resistant app build on something proven like Bitorrent has a chance.
The more I look I to this the more disappointed I get. After a got a post censored and then deleted on nostr (i still dont know how and by whom)and now this , I think this operation is highly suspect, to the point that it may be malicious ? Bittorrent mainline DHT with millions of relays and #pubky may be a better bet.
The Mafia moved upstairs, to the govt. Protection rackets, extortion rackets, plain theft, drugs running. The west is a steaming pile of shit. The west has earned complete collapse. At its core is usury. Compound interest. Eventually the interest eats the principle.
Fees bottlenecks ? Bitcoin fees are pushing higher and we saw previously that LN is not immune. Especially the self custody LN solutions that use bitcoin submarine swaps on the fly. LN has some big problems. IMO
And you conveniently forget the history of this. 1990 "NATO not one inch east"- James Baker, 2 Minsk peace treaties ignored by the west "we just used Minsk to buy time to arm Ukraine"- Merkel and Holland's admitting this, a coup by the west in Ukraine in 2014(no democracy), suspension of Ukraine voting and time limit on the presidency.
You get the pattern ?
You are 100% correct. However, to name those people is not allowed in many countries. Its a jailable offence and you literally get censored on nostr( do these people also wield central power over nostr?). So we plod on with innuendo. How did we get to this state of affairs ?
All inviolable properties can be raised to the quatum level. Like quantum encryption. And then they again become inviolable
Use simplex and just add a searchable directory of available groups. Then you have a secure, properly decentralised, meta data free Telegram upgrade without a CEO. Job done. Don't reinvent the wheel.
“Gold can’t achieve transaction finality without the help of a government or central party.”
nostr:npub1cn4t4cd78nm900qc2hhqte5aa8c9njm6qkfzw95tszufwcwtcnsq7g3vle calmly explaining the shortcomings of #Gold in relation to #Bitcoin as Peter Schiff listens...
I think he's missing these key components, gold doesn't have an unalterable public ledger , gold tends to get stored centrally because of security problems and gold is not readily assayable.
Eg. Ft Knox has never been publicly audited and will never be publicly audited. There may not even be any gold in there, or it may not belong to who you think it does , if it is there.
If you don't know if the gold exists or where it is and it is insecure to carry and you cannot tell easily if its real gold , you cannot back money with gold. There's the problem.
Skin in the game solves all these problems. People who have money saved in bitcoin are already incentivised. I am not concerned if the base layer ossifies. That's a feature.
Peter Todd can't be Satoshi. Satoshi knows history, economics, finance, psychology, networks , computers and math.

