Avatar
Muslim Bitcoiner
e0921d610ee655396cfac6c9907b6ad11f3a1dde5770029e1284e6cae0fe7bd5
Bitcoin cultist. Co-founder of Bitcoin Majlis. Author of Anti-riba Money.

This the CEO of Lightspark by the way. A filthy Zionist that advocates for genocide of the Palestinians. Irredeemable.

Oh and it looks like this company is really pushing for stablecoins and shitcoins on the lightning network.

Best to avoid this company all together.

The uncs are in control here nostr:note15ajzm4n2xpmql9v3ssyn0ty4zqf7qharww64t2fhfc6vlky83nwqy2jk92

Bookmarking this for new users. Thanks for the write up

Brilliant. The only thing I disagree with is that from my experience, the average person is very much in favor of price controls, particularly rent and food. Even "educated" people are very much in favor of it too, or feel indifferent that they cannot conceive of any consequences from price controls.

Replying to Avatar Max

# BOOK LAUNCH!

# The Praxeology of Privacy

v0.1.0 Now Available

I'm excited to announce the publication of **"The Praxeology of Privacy: Economic Logic in Cypherpunk Implementation"** - a complete manuscript bridging Austrian economics with cypherpunk cryptography.

## What Is This Book?

This work proves that **privacy isn't just a preference—it's an economic necessity**. Through rigorous praxeological analysis, it demonstrates that privacy is logically required for rational economic action, property rights, and voluntary exchange.

### The Core Argument

I develop a **Three-Axiom Framework** showing how:

- **Privacy enables economic calculation** (building on Mises)

- **Privacy protects rational discourse** (extending Hoppe)

- **Privacy provides resistance tools** (following Voskuil)

The result? A systematic proof that surveillance systems create the same calculation problems as socialist planning, while cryptographic tools restore the conditions necessary for free markets.

## Why This Matters

For too long, privacy advocates have relied on moral arguments while economists have ignored cryptographic innovation. This book bridges that gap, showing that:

- **Cypherpunks** gain rigorous economic foundations for their tools

- **Austrian economists** discover how cryptography solves fundamental problems

- **Everyone** learns why privacy is essential for human flourishing

## What's Inside

~70,000 words across 21 chapters covering:

- Economic logic of digital signatures and zero-knowledge proofs

- How surveillance destroys market discovery processes

- Cryptographic property rights and enforcement mechanisms

- Practical framework for building parallel economies

- Original theoretical contributions to both traditions

## Download Now

**Complete manuscript available in multiple formats:**

- Light/Dark PDFs for reading

- Summary collection for overview

- Text-to-speech optimized version

- Individual chapters + full archive

👉 **Download here:** towardsliberty.com/pop

## The Best Part

This work is **100% public domain**. Copy it, share it, sell it, modify it—whatever helps spread these ideas.

## Next Steps

- **Researchers**: I welcome feedback, critique, and collaboration

- **Educators**: Use this material in courses and discussions

- **Practitioners**: Apply the framework to evaluate privacy technologies

- **Publishers**: Contact me about formal publication opportunities

I would love to get some serious review before we print the first batch, so please reach out with critique and improvement proposals.

This represents a couple years of research connecting two intellectual traditions that desperately needed each other. I believe it's the first systematic praxeological analysis of cryptography—and hopefully not the last.

**What do you think? Does this framework resonate with your understanding of privacy and economics? Do I make any logical flaws?**

Will definitely read this! I had a mental outline for something like this in my head. Really glad it's being written

I promise you the contents of the book are way more offensive than the wojack pic. Probably a good sign that they shouldn't read it if the wojack picture is giving them an issue. Zero chance they'll ever get orange pilled.

We gotta get Nostr + Bitcoin tech on this list here

https://techforpalestine.org/projects/

Sometime this month inshaAllah. Just making some final edits

Replying to Avatar alp

Whoaaa

Just realized that the image got hella compressed uploading it on nostr. The original image is way cleaner

Alright fellas what are we thinking?

I could see this administration (or the next one) also requiring nonprofits to sign something to promise to not boycott Israeli products.

Bitcoin being permissionless and censorship resistant is extremely useful in this context

The sparse aspect is a blessing alhamdulilah. We get to set the stage here as more and more elite Muslims leave the cesspool that is MT.

And also because of the inevitable increased censorship on those platforms.

Also please enable zaps! I need to zap you

Many people miss this important distinction

Despite all of the faults of big mega corporations, you at least have the option of not doing business with them

For governments, no such option exists. Your property will get confiscated/violated if you don't do "business" with them. They can never go bankrupt as long as they are able to violate and expropriate the property of its citizens

Of course, this distinction gets blurred when corporations leverage the power of government + central banks to grant themselves unfair monopoly privileges, especially with bail outs and subsidies. But this points to the problem back at governments + central banks not allowing a free market in money production.

Might need to start a regular live steam on nostr where we shit on Muslim twitter. I think it would be a lot of fun. I think it would actually entice more Muslims to move to Nostr since MT is a dumpster fire, mostly.

I'm addicted to zapping people from my own node. Hard to describe the feeling.

Replying to Avatar Form*

We heard people were looking for good reliable calendar solutions on nostr.

Introducing https://calendar.formstr.app

It only works for public NIP-52 calendars for now. But the plan is to be a fully functioning calendar replacement on nostr, just like we did for forms.

Special Kudos to nostr:nprofile1qqs2ytd7283uwxdd3vkdc0j0lsshdusrw0esy7m858wxcm5hd77ddkqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq37amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wv45kuatwv3a8wctw0f5kwtnnwpskxegpr9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucm9wf3kzarjdamxztndv5erdfpv the primary dev on this, let's fix the stupid internet one usecase at a time!

Will check this out. Thank you guys so much for taking the time to build this

So yeah... This was a bust... Only 2 people showed up in meat space and only 4 or 5 people tuned in.

The cool thing was showing how fast it is to install Linux mint. Took us like 15 minutes. Super easy.

Oh well. I did what I said I was gonna do. Bright side is that I'm getting the Bosnian brother to join us on nostr inshaAllah. He seems very interested. nostr:note148gccfu2e2utdjvwvtvvez88cpvfv9ucjgemdkljlsjj0tjjkuks6k8m8q

"Allah, the Creator of the Universe has set man on earth to worship Him and to be the Guardian of the world."

"Mans charge is that he must abolish usury — even to a blade of grass."

"The time of the Bedouin has begun."

nostr:nevent1qqsxn8t2yjrwulkue3v5jchj2yvau5ry3jyd790agjd0lxqpdtl5p3spyfmhxue69uhkummnw3ez6an9wf5kv6t9vsh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5qgswpysavy8wv4fednavdjvs0d4dz8e6rh09wuqzncfgfek2url8h4grqsqqqqqpmuwc2z

This is something I really want Muslim Bitcoiners to understand.

We all want the Ummah to get orange-pilled. Great. But it’s not gonna happen through the usual pathways. We won't unite under some political party and vote in a Muslim Bitcoin state. Muslims aren't going to get Bitcoinized, especially not in the anti-Riba cypherpunk sense we envision, just because a bunch of scholars say it’s halal or some Muslim country adds BTC to its reserves.

The only viable path I see is the formation of localized cyber cults that operate like a swarm where we constantly meme and agitate.

By cult I don’t mean it in a negative way, but as a collective formed around memes, lore, aesthetics, symbols, shared mythos and principles. It's decentralized, kinda non-hierarchical, and permeable. It shifts and adapts across both cyberspace and meatspace.

When we say “Bitcoin is anti-Riba money", it's hyperstition. That means Muslim Bitcoiners have to act as if this financial Hijra is already underway.

We’re not here to build another NGO or Islamic finance startup or dawah institution. Those models are outdated and gay. We have to stay culturally viral and organizationally minimal!

Bitcoin Majlis is meant to be a node and a beacon. Something others can mirror, fork, build on. It’s also a catalyst for a broader emergence of the rise of an “anti-Riba cypherpunk” and a Muslim form of “toxic Bitcoin maximalism.” Because Bitcoin gives the Muslim, any muslim that wants to break free, the tools for actual digital and financial vicegerency in hypemodernity.

Praxis looks like:

– memes, images, language that embody “toxic” anti-Riba sovereignty

– memetic agitation against apologetic discourse (“fiat Muslim,” or this idea that Bitcoin is wajib not just halal, Islamic banking is fiat, etc)

– going from cyberspace to meatspace like local Majlis meetups, regional hubs, zakat and sadaqa over Lightning, and Muslim Bitcoin summits

This should all sound familiar if you've been following us. We’re already doing this. I’m not saying this is some abstract theory. I’m saying this is the only path I see.

The goal is for the cult to die. Make a world where Bitcoin Majlis doesn’t even need to exist anymore. Because Riba is dead and delegitimized. Because Bitcoin is finally understood as a tool for Islamic civilization that can actually engage with and outlive hypermodernity.

nostr:nevent1qqsv94gx9rjyv2kxecjhyhvlvwnwskgr6jpctl9ypq0qv0wzflla2qcpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqzyrsfy8tppmn92wtvltrvnyrmdtg37wsamethqq57z2zwdjhqleaa2qcyqqqqqqgskpjmx

Happy ATH

We will continue being right

It's time

nostr:note13s0cwaerh940tmjjp8swckssu683xlszxtapcsgx0de73494x8gqlu02ls

You will connect to NoorNode nostr:naddr1qq24zkj8tag56u338pxkkkn8wverjvzlxahxjq3qh8lhed2da096g2wcsh2crmyvenune046rqkejc8f8pcaag8qj25qxpqqqp65wa74het

Replying to smalltownrifle

I just read an LLM-generated summary of 'Has government any role in money?' by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz

I get what Hoppe means when he criticises the use of empiricism in social sciences, especially economics.

In empiricism, you make a proposition, which may or may not be true, so it has to tested and validated through evidence and data. Even then, your proposition isn't necessarily true and is subject to falsification still.

So you're left with a situation where policy makers and governments keep testing their policies on civilians like they're lab rats.

Tyrranical policies like tariffs, financial surveillance and taxation are only bad if there is evidence and data that prove that they are bad.

Even if evidence and data say so, they don't necessarily mean the policies are bad. Somewhere, some variable needs to be tweaked and accounted for, so that the policy can be tried more effectively. The policy itself isn't bad. The lab rats on which they are tested are bad.

And so Friedman, having compared folks from the rationalist Austrian school as dogmatists/cultists in one of his public appearances, having played a role in the establishment of the strictly empiricist Chicago school, starts questioning the role of Government in the monetary market in the paper I mentioned above.

Even then, based on the summary I've been able to obtain, Friedman does not come to the correct conclusion that government has no role at all. He argues for a limited role, claiming that a free market in money is not practical due to what he believes is historical evidence, which validates another criticism that Austrian school folks like Hoppe levies on empiricists that they have a flawed understanding of causal links.

To get a glimpse of the 'other side' - rationalism, and its methodology of arriving at incontestable truths through reflective and deductive reasoning, which the Austrian school is based on, I highly recommend reading the following book in this note I mentioned:

nostr:nevent1qqstyu05txmfk5pyhcc6xz3q2au8vkm7ay9ygr8g50r2ldrql9jrh6spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygp57x42dv2s3hst4vlssmzt6kaa0dg0skv528rwdzkf2h7gxm3u6cpsgqqqqqqsz4a5yg

Currently reading Hoppe’s The Economics and Ethics of Private Property, which is just a collection of his essays. He goes in deep to criticize empericism in some of the essays, especially in how it relates to relativism and positivism.

Hoppe argues that bureaucrats and central bankers prefer empericism/positivism because it allows them to cloak their coercion in scientific respectability. Under positivism, no economic principle, no matter how logical or self-evident, can be accepted as true without empirical testing. This means that claims like "taxation reduces productivity" or "printing money leads to inflation" are treated as just hypotheses. That opens the door for state actors to propose the opposite, like taxation or money printing leads to prosperity, under the guise of being "open-minded experiments."

When the results inevitably disappoint, positivism gives them an escape hatch that any failure can be blamed on uncontrolled variables, not the core theory. This basically immunizes their policies from first principles based rational critique. So empericism/positivism becomes the perfect intellectual shield for power because it undermines deductive economic truths and turns every policy into a trial-and-error game where coercion is always worth “trying.”

Highly recommend reading it after you're done with Economic science and Austrian Method!