I don't want a rule blocking them from doing so, I don't want them to hold people's Bitcoin either. Oh well
Perhaps you are right. I will say though that everything we complain about in banking is not due to crimes being committed, rather they are doing things explicitly allowed under laws and inost cases encouraged and required for fiat to continue.
We shall see though.
Unless it is done by Congress, Loomis or someone else, it's not happening.
This is actually huge. Hopefully something like a zap comes to centralized video platforms.
It will never beat nostr, but a great idea for tether and rumble to try and take on YouTube.
Ones land is what you can take and keep. Nothing more. Jerusalem is Israel's land until someone takes it.
USDC is not tether. They are already fully backed and held reserved and OFAC compliant.
And Yes, if you are holding the liability side of the government asset, you absolutely would be required to keep it backed fully. No question.
We are talking about the reserve, keeping a stockpile, not cdbc or private alternatives.
Well, it would be open on the ledger, so I'm not sure how they could skim? It's a stablecoin. Nobody is going to sell the country $1 stablecoins for less than $1. Circle isn't ever going to say hey, buy 20B worth of USDC for 15B. They are fully regulated and audited on the reserves as well.
And the amount of coins held would be public like all Treasury accounts and balances, debts, ledgers etc are.
I believe he just doesn't have a clue, personally. People likely want it because it is free branding and will get others to buy their BS. That's my guess.
This is one of the major problems with US healthcare. I am here for a sports physical that cost me $20 cash. But literally the first question is insurance id card and copay please.
Insurance is for horrific accidents, unplanned issues, cancer, etc...
Health Insurance is not for a $20 sports physical or even a $100 doctor visit. That's insane and incredibly administratively innedicient.
nostr:nprofile1qqsq0rqv0z34umfmc2g23cqfw9zwr47ywxq47glge7smpq4cpd2zf4qpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0rkkvrp is a fantastic model.
I don't see anything good. The word lawful, digital assets, stolen goods.... Nothing good there.
I don't want them to have a Bitcoin reserve. I want them to beg me for mine in the future. Which I will never sell them.
It doesn't enrich anyone really. Perhaps just some initial fees for the USDC or whatever. Then their liquidity is locked up. Not good for the network of a stablecoins.
I'm here, nowhere else. That's all we need. 🤣
Forget Solana, what in the hell would the US need a stockpile of dollar pegged stablecoins for?????
Just keep dollars
He does not know what toss did, he does not understand Bitcoin. He will be dead soon, we will keep on
I'm with you. I argued for 30 mins with a lawyer client of mine who does estate planning. He didn't understand why anyone may need or want Bitcoin, nor the value of incorporating Bitcoin into his business and estate plans, trusts, wills, etc ..
Exhausting.
Yep. Through the magic of cryptography.
Usernames and passwords are the norm of course, but on NOSTR with your nsec(private key), you now can view, sign, follow, etc... no matter which nostr app.
Note though, there is no 'password recovery'. Keep it safe!
Welcome.
