Avatar
(>0_0)>
e5308b9c04ec5cc2bae04b5a70a7da79b28501a0676c243375813eb0cf8f4c08
The zaps must flow. ⚡️⚡️⚡️

Was that your trained attack whale?

🏃‍♂️🐳

I’m very interested to see where RISC-V goes in the future.

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/risc-v-laptop-looks-like-thinkpad

Replying to Avatar (>0_0)>

😨

Thank you 💜🫂🧡

Per Evgeny on #simplex

Signal adopting highly controversial Kyber without making DR pq-resistant is a similar story: protecting some part of the system, without protecting the whole system, and failing to be explicit about it. See https://signal.org/blog/pqxdh/ - while it's not incorrect, strictly speaking, it creates the impression that DR is now PQ secure, without it being achieved. On PQ-resistance, we are reviewing our options, and Streamlined NTRU-Prime 761 seems the most promising candidate at this point, and it's "relatively simple" to make DR PQ resistant: https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/blob/ep/pqdr/docs/rfcs/2023-09-30-pq-double-ratchet.md

#[0]​ is looking at adding post #quantum #encryption to their double ratchet protocol. Seems like the way #Signal did it was substandard

#simplex

https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/blob/ep/pqdr/docs/rfcs/2023-09-30-pq-double-ratchet.md

🤣🤣🤣

lnbc80080n1pjn92gspp5eruenpxvyrr2yvfgnptnhgctcm389s2mx9k99dd85meu5au7apusdqqcqzzsxqyz5vqsp5gv06rq3v9sa9k8t7mgvl34sqva2nll5ekh8ndaftvfk393yyr7ks9qyyssqkfgtcv4hx2x90d7hupa64zwf3742uxngmx2kfvu7qk9ftz647lrhkte5kgtvdjp42g3nutygtxswvfx65g4ymdrlzlknt3t7uk8jn2qpf3mxme