Today's work is done👍

Contrast and Image Quality Adjustment. #photography #artwork

Good night😴

#photography #artwork

Contrast and Image Quality Adjustment.

# Skip The Booth and #VoteOrange!

By voting orange for Bitcoin, individuals signal a departure from the traditional red-blue binary. They embrace a vision that combines the strengths of diverse political ideologies while mitigating their respective weaknesses. This symbolic choice signifies a commitment to a decentralized, transparent, and fair future, where the power of currency lies in the hands of the people rather than political institutions. In doing so, the orange vote for Bitcoin advocates for a singular foundation of objective truth that transcends the divisive realm of politics.

On the one hand, Bitcoin aligns with the principles often associated with "the left." Its decentralized and inclusive nature fosters a sense of community and empowerment, addressing concerns related to wealth inequality and financial inclusivity. The blockchain, a fundamental component of Bitcoin, serves as a transparent and immutable ledger, promoting accountability and fairness.

Conversely, Bitcoin resonates with elements typically championed by "the right." Its emphasis on individual autonomy, property rights, and limited government intervention aligns with conservative values. Bitcoin's finite supply mirrors fiscal responsibility, offering a hedge against inflation and centralized manipulation of currency.

Skip the traditional red or blue vote; opt for orange by staying home, purchasing Bitcoin, and moving it to self-custody. Empower yourself by embracing financial independence. In this decentralized realm, your vote resonates through the blockchain, advocating for a future where personal autonomy and control over your own wealth take precedence.

Wait that’s wine 😆

Bottom right

Can you find the cat?

#Artstr

It is positive to challenge your beliefs about what you think you know.

It can be disconcerting to your family when you 180 on a topic sometimes, but I’d rather be correct, and grow than be stable on every topic.

I have become convinced that the average tech writer (e.g. Wired, Linux Format, et al.) is making their readers stupider. It’s a genuine disservice. It’s like me trying to write articles on oncology or something.

Simplifications are necessary tools for teaching, but they are dangerous in the hands of someone who doesn’t have the higher level knowledge to correct the many things wrong with the simplification (which is honestly, almost everything) later on, and with readers who will never dive deeper.

The problem with people isn’t the things they don’t know, it’s the things they know that just ain’t so. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

And I can’t count the number of times I hear someone say something online that makes it exceptionally clear they read bs tech writers, and base product or personal decisions on it, to their detriment.

If I had to choose one dish for the rest of my life I think that will be" fresh bigoli with duck sauce" and of course rivers of prosecco