Yup, this is where I'm at. A slow shift away from their legal world. I like what yellen replied though, if I could lift my game to reach that level.
Not gonna lie, I'm kind of exhausted thinking about that method. Is that how you operate? I'm guessing it gets easier over time.
How do people here approach privacy online? I have some ideas:
- One persona for internet
(seems easy for opponent to build a profile of who I am as it crosses so many services)
- One persona per service
(seems difficult to organise)
- Give up and use my identity
(convenience and acceptance but also slavery)
Any thoughts, philosophies, alternatives?
my assumption at this point is that some agency or institution somewhere has access to everything i have access to.
if i had the talent, i would work on an AI firewall. our devices should live in an air gapped bubble, making a bunch of requests and sending on a bunch of responses, that are collected, inspected and then relayed by the AI firewall, once each interval set by the user, i.e. once per hour.
Imagine a world where paying with cash (legal tender) is an act of revolution. Oh wait ... https://nostr.build/av/870d4dd1e110b2671b8b2496c6e1e6776a72a4bff2fe25f3d68dca487e9e9ef4.mov
that guy is such a legend
Gm 🌞☕️
Gm 🌞☕️🥐💜
What's up with Nostr's wikipedia entry lol. Vitalik Buterin? That's the best they could come up with?
Can anyone edit this to include the big name bitcoiners? That said, not sure if wikipedia matters anymore.

perfect. im gonna go xeet on xitter right now actually
same. no one knows what on Earth im talking about when I say something happened on X
and the change of “tweets” to “posts”, inevitable as it was, just underlines what a dumb name X is 😆
You can read and absorb a thousand books and still make the wrong move. There's something to be said about being aware of the ground you stand on.
Yeh, this multi-culturalism & secularity... is, to me, placing the state above our own beliefs and expectations of behaviors. We have an over-class crushing attempts to resolve the problem as they thrive on the confusion.
Totally on board then, it's a kind of wistful, utopian thinking; 'If only everyone was more intelligent, our problems would dissolve'. But, if anything, the potential for differences would multiply exponentially, and game theory remains.
🤣
Right, I get what you mean. It's a bit like having more horsepower than a vehicle can translate into actual motion, it just ends up as heat, wear and tear that degrades the system.
I think I agree, but only in so far as it's treated as an end in itself. Intelligence is a tool, its importance depends on the end in mind and the material you work with it.
Intelligence can destroy communities or build them, as an example. In that sense, wisdom is comparatively underrated. But yeh, I'd still rate intelligence as up there with the atom bomb, higher in fact.
