There's a significant difference though. Lie about your identity on Zucks platforms and you may get away with it for a while but when they demand verification you'll lose your entire account with all its posts, comments, and reactions along with it.
Same thing happens on Bull? You've lost nothing, because you already have self custody of the sats.
What you're complaining about is the government regulations, when what you should be doing is praising Bull for offering a practical workaround that allows you to bypass the verification requirements.
I care less about what "it says" than what it allows.
Call me crazy but the ability to stack KYC-free sats is more important than whether or not I was asked a question - that I'm free to lie about - in order to stack those KYC-free sats.
The half that you'd like to see Bullbitcoin shut down and plebs unable to stack KYC-free BTC?
Just watching him shill it on Twitter at the time was enough for me.
I'm not sure how an article would prove anything more than his own tweets did.
Bro you sound like someone who clicks "I am under 18" and then complains you can't get on a website to view porn.
It's self-reported and no verification is forced. I'm not sure what more you want them to do. Violate the law/get shut down/be unable to offer KYC-free sats?
Is that what you'd prefer?
You can't show me - which even a customer could do, you don't need to ask Bullbitcoin - because they don't verify your identity before allowing you to complete your transactions without KYC
KYC not just implies but demands customer identity verification.
By allowing you to stack your sats without verifying the identity you've provided, they absolutely are enabling you to stack KYC-free sats.
Verified your identity*
I meant to say
Show me where they've verified your address before they give you your sats and I'll agree.
KYC laws demand identification for verification.
By allowing you to buy (and self custody) the sats without verification, Bullbitcoin is absolutely enabling KYC-free sats to be stacked.
Right now, the Tor tools and services built and maintained by the Tor Project are protecting the privacy of millions of people. Because the Tor Project is a nonprofit, this work is powered by donations from our community—by you.
Your support ensures that the Tor Project remains strong on an organizational level, and that the ecosystem of Tor services and tools continue to reach the people who need privacy online the most.
https://torproject.org/donate/donate-md-ann-2023
"Right now, the Tor tools and services built and maintained by the Tor Project are protecting the privacy of millions of people."
With so many of the TOR exit nodes being honeypots run by the NSA and other alphabet agencies, how exactly is Tor protecting anyone's privacy?
So you can or you can't stack KYC-free sats using the method described?
Bro just sign up with a fake name and an email address not associated with your real name or other online accounts.
There's no verification, you just have to put something/anything in for a name.
Well my nickname for him kinda gave that away - he was a paid shill to push government mandated experimental gene editing technology on an uninformed (and thus unable to consent) population.
Bro I've been hearing this argument since before Bitcoin broke $1.
It hasn't happened yet and you've offered no evidence or even a theory of how such a thing could even happen, so there's nothing for me to dispute here.
The game theory is what leads us TO a Bitcoin standard. Thinking that the game theory only applies once we're on a Bitcoin standard gives no explanation for what is driving us towards that Bitcoin standard (and driving the price up).
Thinking that game theory only applies ON a Bitcoin standard shows a complete lack of understanding of both Bitcoin AND game theory.
I didn't say it would go up and down at the same time. Logic fail on your part.
I said it either goes up, and my net worth goes up now - or it goes down, allowing me to stack more sats at unrealistically affordable rates, and ensures my net worth goes up more in the future.
Either way I and other plebs benefit. So explain to me how either one of these is bad.
Well, besides the obvious - that propaganda works, and by listening to it you're making yourself vulnerable to it's influence.
But leaving that aside for a moment, what I was trying to say was more along the lines of: if you're listening to a propagandist in the first place you've ALREADY failed the critical thinking test.
The price is affected?
If price goes up my wealth goes up.
If price goes down my ability to stack more wealth goes up.
Explain to me why EITHER of these is undesirable