Thank you for asking! I was too afraid and have been bumbling around since I got here. Not tagging, replying or posting notes properly. And all the mistakes there etched in stone.
#plebchain
Sorry. I was kidding about defenseless AI, and referring to me not verifying the whole article. Not you. It’s actually really good.
Both claiming the defenseless Language Model’s work. 😆
Don’t trust, verify 🤦♂️
Doh!!
Very bottom of the article:
“Este artículo fue editado de una conversación con Chat GPT 4”
This article was edited from a conversation with Chat GPT 4
Weird thing about the the guy in the bottom left on the actual paper:
Juan Camet
Experto en negocios digitales
(Expert in Digital Business)
“está diseñado para mantener su valor a largo plazo”
(It is designed to hold its value over the long term.)
I assumed he was the author or possibly quoted within. That line is in the article was not in quotes and the online version is credited to this guy:
Raúl Mendoza. Autor de contenidos y de las últimas noticias del diario La República. Experiencia como redactor en varias temáticas y secciones sobre noticias de hoy en Perú y el mundo.
I’d like to know which guy really wrote it.
Found it! The Republic’s site is filled with too many ads.
https://larepublica.pe/domingo/2023/04/02/el-camino-bitcoin-domingo-132074
I was really frustrated with the whole bitcoin as a weapon narrative. The only weapon is the mind that controls the tool. A bomb, screwdriver nor transaction have malice. Human action can be a weapon though, and thought feeds that action. If you continually project your feelings of malice on an object you’re more likely to use it in that way.
#[0]ZapMart
Zap or Lightening Market
ZapBazaar
LighteningBazaar
ZapOutlet
ZapBotique
Zaporium
UTXOutlet <- My personal favorite
The users get to see how the sausage is made. It’s like your making Dominos pizza and we have our faces pressed up against the plexiglass.
😳 Well, as long as it’s fiat, it shouldn’t matter in the long run.
Good morning!
Just curious how a loop situation like this would resolve from client, relay and protocol perspective?
Just wonder if this would just affect users in the thread, their relays, or would this be a non-event. Sorry if this is a dumb Q, still learning.
#[0]
#[1] #[2]
Not sure how I’d feel about that. Or if I’d feel at all, I guess
Everything’s cool as long as the idiocy is shorter than your audiences current term. Fiat-time doesn’t exist beyond election cycles. And looks like the same may be true for Twitter.
Yes, and there is so much development within the open market that you get to choose the diet.
You’ll see bots - useful ones, annoying ones, and you may choose to block one until you need it.
Hopefully you’ll see a decentralized GitHub, and Habla exists now for publishing.
Back in the 90’s when I was first on the internet, this was the promise we saw. 30 years later we’re finally arriving back to the initial vision.
Back then we were also fighting in the US for privacy. They didn’t want to allow 56bit encryption outside the US. Demanding key escrow. They’re at it again. Trying to take privacy and RESTRICT our access.
I wouldn’t try to put nostr in a box or compare it to twitter. Twitter is a client app that connects to a Twitter server.
Nostr is a protocol
Your just using an app and relays to communicate using nostr.
This May be a bad analogy, but here goes…
If a web server is a relay then the browser is Damus (or Iris, Amethyst etc…) And that would make nostr HTTPS.
If someone has a better description, please step in. 😊
It’s on there. Just further down on the list. You can use the Search function in Mempool to search for different liquidity providers…
