more than worrying about your eclipse glasses y'all need to turn your wifi off while you sleep because i am worried about your brains being erased.
never ceases to amaze me the entire world loses an entire work day to "the moon" every week and then spends the rest of it unraveling the bullshit performance from monday.
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m
should be noted i have no issue seeing facebook narratives properly on my end. the filter does not impact my view.
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m
i had one anon facebook account i followed gardening stuff and no humans. that's the only one i ever used. have fun.
as for having deleted all men who use facebook: also relevant. 😎😂🤟🏻☀️
today is the day when everyone pretends they are a celestial body of some sort and no one has any idea what or why but everyone pretends it all seems very significant.
the global human system is not intellectual enough to handle the esoteric concept of a solar eclipse on a monday, folks. just do whatever you want.
informing about the realities and layers of an issue, and opposing them are not the same thing as banning it. there are are so many nuances on recognizing when someone in leadership offers a moral barometer but not a forced directive. i am not a fan of the pope necessarily, but the stance that bought babies and physical mutilation regarding sex changes are a moral calamity is ethically sound. that is not the same thing as laws against it happening. huge difference. this is why there are laws and there is religion and that morality exists outside of the judicial system - you cannot police morality, only discuss it in open discourse. discourse exists to challenge ethical norms and to reinforce them as well; laws are meant to regulate social order, not morality. the slippery slope of considering religious moralism as a signal for creating laws is misguided - there can be conversations about acceptable behavior without the need to legalize or make illegal activity. in fact, the reason robust discourse exists in society is to self-regulate norms: we comment and argue and protest in order to naturally regulate extremism. extremist laws develop when conversation and discourse are stifled by ignorance and fear.
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m fyi:
the_valley: i have no had a mining problem in months and the last 2 days i have had endless vibe shifts. find it please and shut it off and report it.
already improved - ☀️
i have never seen emily in paris. is it any good? i was a hit piece so i never bothered checking it out.
nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m fyi:
the_valley: i have no had a mining problem in months and the last 2 days i have had endless vibe shifts. find it please and shut it off and report it.
i am not running against him. i never do. i have other things to do. i am ignoring him. he is creating his own drama. he always does. he always perceives every situation as an opportunity for himself to make money or generate attention - and even if it is his protocol, he supports what it does. if he is having a difficult time with killing my storyline and the repercussions of my losing my book content - instead of pretending he is a victim (something he often rails against) - he should do something constructive about it. which he does not. which is precisely the repetitive point. he wants to be forgiven over and over because he's a loveable bumbling fool: which he is not. he's a narcissist and not particularly interested in anything genuine. learn the lesson. we have done this over and over again. or don't. but my job is not to make him feel better about his thoughtlessness. if he believes that's death stranding: add it to the victim list then. i am not pretending. he can spend every dime running his pity me content if he wants. i have no interest in once again participating in boost elon's ego even though elon is at fault.
that's why.
good morning, dorsey 🎈☀️🤟🏻.
none of that makes any difference with give collective consciousness and ai. i think the illusion censorship is not driven by human intervention and psychosis regarding their perception of filtered information is most of the problem. and the intentional misuse of overly filtered groups for chaos stoking is the reason bubbles form. regardless, there is no perfect solution with ignorant humans. you cannot maintain discursive codes and limit access to understanding intelligent design while expecting humans to evolve into symbiosis with tech. without honest education about smart tech, there is no correction. those who wax poetic about the magic are culpable in the con. simple.
when they have a "guilty but so cute you can't resist" protocol to try and force the end to uncomfortable situations which they created but are disinterested in addressing for real -
i am busy.