He rage-address-optimized.
But who owns this data and how will it be used in the future by say insurance AI personalized actuarial tables?
In a trade-off sort of way, sure. But the natural progression from “why is there something instead of nothing” to “how can I be freer” is inevitable (since the good life seeker must be a freedom maxi).
A little amoral sublation does a body politic good. There is no plot without hurting the slave: there is no other way for us to make meaning, hope as we may that positive psychology will fix this.
There’s never been a better age for applied intelligence. Bitcoin is proof of remote intelligence.
Yes, bitcoin/usable hard money decentralizes taste management incentives. It turns taste makers (noun) into taste makers (verb) through the freedom to sponsor whomever whenever wherever.
The whole middle class construct will be rearchitected according to many patrons, not few.
Bitcoin shatters hierarchy (and its heretofore totalizing tendencies) into a 1000 points of light.
Working on a screenplay with an LLM and the humor and ability to structure nuances in tone, when pruned with rich intent and talent, is responsive and very good.
Would be an opt in situation, not forced. However, lower information savers would likely be gamed into unfavorable risk/reward scenarios.
Similar to the paradox of how to tax the rich without chasing them out of your jurisdiction, how to deregulate ownership of IP while fostering an environment for innovation?