Avatar
a source familiar with the matter
f5b55f6b44b8997b2b6e8469a6a57f8d3f3b2ef27023543445c40ecec485ee64
<script src="https://pastebin.com/embed_js/TstHh0VL"></script>

"I do not ask you to lay hands on the tyrant to topple him over, but support him no longer and you will behold him - like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away - fall of his own weight and break into pieces"

Etienne de la Boetie, Politics of Obedience

Replying to Avatar Liberty Gal

God told us how he did it. I take Him at His word.

When I was first reading Genesis 1, it seemed so strange that God went into what seemed to me the wordy, "It was evening and morning the first day." "It was evening and morning the second day." etc. Now I know why He said it that way. He knew that people were going to say that He created over billions of years and He wanted to make Himself perfectly clear. Yes, "Yom" (the Hebrew word for day) can mean an indeterminate period of time, but whenever it is used with a number, the word morning and/or the word evening, it always means a literal 24 hour day. He worded Genesis 1 to make sure you had to 100% ignore His words to believe anything else.

There are also little details like the Earth being made before the Sun and stars (unlike in the Big Bang Theory) and plants being created before the sun (which works for 24 hours but not millions or billions of years.

Scientists that believe in a literal 6 day creation have done a much better job of predicting what evidence we will find than those who believe in the Big Bang and billions of years. They've been saying the Big Bang is settled science for many decades, but they have to change it every couple of years to make it sort of match the evidence. The same is true of Darwinian Evolution (and its various spin-off forms of Evolution)

The more science I study, the more I think the Big Bang and evolution are a religion and anti-science story telling. When I was in high school, a bunch of things didn't make sense, but I just assumed that there were things I didn't understand and the specialists had figured it all out. Then I found out that almost all scientists are specialists. They all assume someone else figured it all out (especially with evolution). The biochemists think the biologists figured out how life came to be. The biologists think the paleontologist figured out how life came to be and the paleontologists think the biochemists figured it out. The truth is that a cell is so complex and especially irreducibly complex that it is incomprehensible to believe life happened by chance.

How do you know that is the word of God?

Drums easy

For some reason all the other folks in the thread say flat or both

Why? What is so great about flats?

Drums you can eat with one hand

Looks like a political realignment to me

Liberals (ie cares about liberty but economically illiterate) from Dem to GOP

Neocons (ie pro-war, pro-big government) from GOP to Dem

https://nypost.com/2024/09/13/opinion/im-a-democrat-but-i-joined-the-gop-and-back-trump/

Given that US paleo-conservatives are fundamentally liberal (since the US Constitution is relatively liberal) perhaps US liberals will control a major political party for the first time since 1896

I looked it up and it seems like they're trying to make kickoffs function more like normal plays, which seems pretty sensible to me.

It looks like the onside kick rules are a victim of reworking kicks generally, so perhaps some fine tuning over time will help. The idea of only being allowed to do them in the 4th quarter and without the element of surprise is... somehow anticompetitive in my view. Imagine if you couldn't pass the ball unless you declared it to the other team before the play... it's just silly.

Cartridges are cheap, good for barter if it comes to that, and definitely qualify as a "you'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it" item

What is the true essence of democracy if not mob rule?

“Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods.”

― H.L. Mencken

I mean reality - that which exists. Nature.

I would call it God, but I believe you insist that God created Nature, so that might not make much sense for you.

That's part of the official 9/11/01 narrative

A plane hit the budget office where they were working out what happened to the trillions (with a T) of dollars announced missing the day before

Or perhaps something else exploded that office

If you'd like to refute it, I think you have to explain why it's OK to lack any theory about how God came to be (or why he's always existed) but it's not OK to (more simply) lack a theory about how reality came to be (or why it's always existed)