Avatar
Bitcoin Wizard 🧙🏻‍♂️
f69a576c57a17e967882520b6bacd3f7135f4c9abd4d058585cfc7efa8e2c697

Reddit censorship. Nostr fixes this

Replying to Avatar waxwing

Did you ever stop and *really* think about what it means to "do a Satoshi Nakamoto"?

Context for my weird question: I have met many, many bitcoiners over the years. Many of them take a stab at keeping privacy by doing some combo of: not revealing name, not revealing location, not revealing face. Etc. So often, if I happen to meet them in person, they end up revealing the things that they were hiding online. Quite literally a mask came off (pre covid!) once we started drinking - a simple, funny anecdotal example of what I mean. Many complain about photos being taken, many focus on always using a pseudonym. I'm sure most people reading recognize these patterns of behaviour.

I can see the purpose, up to a point, so this is not criticism. It's a little like me doing coinjoin "here and there" - you don't expect to defend yourself against a hyper powerful aggressor, only against a casual criminal looking for an easy score.

But if you do want *real* defence against *strong* attackers, you have a huge problem. These half-measures will be useless, perhaps worse than that, if you get overconfident, because the determined investigator only needs *one* strand to pull on, and the measures I describe above, which are almost always rules only half-stuck to anyway, don't cut it, at all.

Which brings me to my point: is it even possible to "go all the way"? Clearly it is; Satoshi Nakamoto is not the only person who's ever done it, but it's pretty damn rare at the very least.

Imagine what it would mean. If you are engaged in a serious project, that takes let's say at least a year's worth of full time work, then you are going to do that for no reward. Not just, no money, people do that quite often when it comes to things they genuinely enjoy, but no recognition, no social context, not even "oh I won't bother you because I know you're busy with that project". Nobody will say that because nobody will know. Imagine doing a full, intense 8 hour day of work (more likely, split over many days) and knowing that there will *never* be a direct reward of any form, for that. And then doing it again, and again.

What's more, you don't just "not get a reward". You have to do almost double the work, to ensure that at every step, every pushed commit or technical discussion, does not expose anything at the network trace level, or the language, vocabulary etc. Managing tricky pseudonym accounts, handling the headaches of Tor etc. I'm not trying to say it needs super-genius level tech skills, I'm trying to say it's a massive amount of effort.

Could you do that? I daren't even ask the question of myself, because I'm almost sure it's a no. But to *imagine* where that kind of motivation would come from, that's what fascinates me.

Satoshi may not have received any encouragement from outside, which many people strive for, but he has achieved inner self-satisfaction. I think that speaks for his strength of character.

Bitcoin Bill of Rights 📜

Article I.

Freedom of Use: Congress shall not legislate any laws that establish control over Bitcoin, nor shall it prohibit the free use of Bitcoin. Furthermore, no governmental interference with Bitcoin's operational protocol shall be permitted.

Article II.

Security of Keys and Nodes: The right of the people to secure their private keys, operate full nodes, and validate transactions through mining, being necessary to the security of a free state, shall not be infringed.

Article III.

Protection Against Seizure: No Bitcoin shall be frozen or seized without a judicial order that demonstrates probable cause and adheres to due process.

Article IV.

Right to Privacy: The right of the people to be secure in their digital personas, homes, devices, and Bitcoin wallets, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue without probable cause.

Article V.

Due Process in Disclosure: No person shall be compelled to reveal their private keys or other secure authentication methods in any legal or criminal proceeding, without due process of law.

Article VI.

Non-Discrimination in Bitcoin Use: The use of Bitcoin shall not be denied or abridged by any state due to the digital nature of the asset, nor shall states impose discriminatory regulations that target Bitcoin uniquely.

Article VII.

Innovation and Development: Individuals have the right to innovate and contribute to the Bitcoin network, including the development and propagation of software, without undue interference, provided they adhere to the decentralized ethos of Bitcoin.

Article VIII.

Financial Sovereignty: Individuals shall have the right to financial sovereignty and privacy, to mine, hold, and transact in Bitcoin freely, without fear of reprisal or disproportionate taxation.

Article IX.

Right to Anonymity: Individuals have the right to anonymity in their Bitcoin transactions and holdings, to the extent that it does not infringe upon the rights of others or violate the law.

“I don’t know… there just aren’t that many videos I want to watch.” Steve Chen, founder of YouTube, expressing doubts about YouTube’s viability as a company. 2005.

Banks close all the time. And there is an unlimited amount of fiat in the central bank.

EU will Bitcoin-Werbung auf Social Media verbieten

"Im Rahmen neuer Regeln, um "Influencer Marketing in der EU zu harmonisieren“, streben die Verbraucherschützer der EU-Staaten in der nächsten Legislaturperiode ein Werbeverbot für Bitcoin in den sozialen Medien an."

https://www.blocktrainer.de/blog/eu-will-bitcoin-werbung-auf-social-media-verbieten/ #nostrfixesthis