The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts
@solari_the
Financial Coup d’Etat: History of the Missing Money
$21 Trillion dollars is missing from the U.S. government. That is $65,000 per person—as much as the national debt!
https://blossom.primal.net/15e0f1434cc60043908685943044074979e96e4361d5c8ce3ba8f51993ab80e6.mp4
What’s going on? Where is the money? How could this happen? How much has really gone missing? What would happen if a corporation failed to pass an audit like this? Or a taxpayer?
This means the Fed and their member banks are transacting government money outside the law. So are the corporate contractors that run the payment systems. So are the Wall Street firms who are selling government securities without full disclosure. Would your banks continue to handle your bank account if you behaved like this? Would your investors continue to buy your securities if you behaved like this? Would your accountant be silent?
This is the reason that there is such a strong push to change or tear up the U.S. Constitution. This is why members of the establishment say the Constitution is “old,” “outdated!” This is why there is such a push for gun control. Don’t buy it! We can use the Constitution to get our money and our government back. It is time to enforce the U.S. Constitution.
diet and health?
AIDS is fake.
what they have is what happens when you grossly and continually violate Natural Law and the Cosmic Order.
"What The Perth Group has argued:
Failure to prove the existence of a unique, exogenously acquired retrovirus, HIV.
Failure to verify the HIV antibody tests proof of HIV infection.
Failure to prove HIV causes immune deficiency (destruction of T4 lymphocytes) or AIDS.
The impossibility of haemophiliacs acquiring HIV following factor VIII infusions.
Failure to prove the HIV genome, (RNA or DNA) originates in a unique exogenously acquired infectious retroviral particle.
Failure to prove HIV/AIDS is infectious, either by blood, blood products or sexual intercourse.
Failure to prove what is called AIDS in Africa or Thailand is caused by HIV or is sexually transmitted.
That AIDS and all the phenomena inferred as "HIV" are induced by changes in cellular redox brought about by the oxidative nature of substances and exposures common to all the AIDS risk groups and to the cells used in the "culture" and "isolation" of HIV.
That AIDS will not spread outside the original risk groups and that cessation of exposure to oxidants and/or use of anti-oxidants will improve the outcome of AIDS patients.
That pharmacological data prove AZT cannot kill HIV and AZT is toxic to all cells and may cause AIDS."
men on #nostr be like... new seeds forever prematurely exposed to sunlight and consistently depotentialized. nostr:note1jtjmghdvqgxes5af8lmpt5nrcl2t3n38yfcxwslkdajl6plsu5zq67n2g9
no.
the problem is that godless americans have lost the plot and sold their soul to the devil...
then they proceed to discourage people with actual courage by making faggoty "pragmatic" and base arguments that water down the issue from spiritual imperative and duty to some kind of fucking selfish quantitative cost/benefit analysis...
gfy.
copy/paste, print, and send to traitor agents:
Here is a draft of a letter, based on "The Memorandum," that is suitable for sending to a Congressman, Senators, or relevant government departments. It is written to establish a formal record of conscientious inquiry and due diligence.
***
[Your Full Name]
[Your Street Address]
[Your City, State, Zip Code]
[Your Email Address]
[Your Phone Number]
[Date]
The Honorable [Congressman's/Senator's Full Name]
[Office Address of Congressman/Senator]
[City, State, Zip Code]
**RE: Formal Inquiry Regarding the Application of Federal Income Tax Following the Supreme Court's Decision in *Moore v. United States***
Dear Representative/Senator [Last Name],
I am writing to you today as a constituent and a law-abiding citizen deeply committed to understanding and following the laws of the United States. My purpose is to seek clarity and official guidance on a matter of significant constitutional importance that has arisen from the recent Supreme Court decision in *Moore et al. v. United States* (June 20, 2024).
While the media focused on the case's specific holding concerning the taxation of unrealized gains, the Court's opinion included a foundational restatement of tax principles that has profound implications for every American. Specifically, on page two of its decision, the Court reaffirmed that **"Taxes on income are indirect taxes, and the 16th Amendment confirms that taxes on income need not be apportioned."**
As you know, under constitutional law, an "indirect tax" is synonymous with an "excise" or "privilege tax," a levy on a government-granted privilege rather than a direct imposition on a right, such as the right to one's own labor and property. This classification is supported by longstanding precedent, including *Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co.* (1916) and *American Airways Co. v. Wallace* (1932).
This legal distinction creates a pressing need for clarification for citizens like myself who are earnestly attempting to comply with the law. My review of the Internal Revenue Code indicates that the federal income tax, found in Subtitle A of Title 26, appears to be structured as such an excise. The statutory framework, particularly Chapter 3 which details the "Withholding of Tax on Non-Resident Aliens and Foreign Corporations," along with the associated Treasury Decisions governing the use of Forms W-4 and 1040, seems to define the taxable privilege as the earning of U.S. source income by foreign persons.
This has placed me, and millions of other Americans, in a position of serious legal uncertainty. For decades, we have routinely executed forms like the W-4 for employers and W-9 for banks under penalty of perjury, effectively assuming the legal status of a "withholding agent" or a party engaged in a privileged activity. However, if the income tax is an excise on a specific privilege that does not pertain to the domestic earnings of a U.S. citizen within a state, then my continued participation in this withholding system may be based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the law.
My primary duty is to obey the law. I do not wish to be in a position where I am either unknowingly failing to meet a legal obligation or, conversely, where I am voluntarily adhering to a administrative process from which I am legally exempt. This ambiguity places conscientious citizens in an untenable position.
Therefore, I respectfully request your assistance in obtaining clear, official answers to the following questions from the relevant authorities, such as the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service:
1. In light of the *Moore* decision's reaffirmation that the income tax is an indirect excise tax, what is the specific government-granted privilege upon which the tax imposed by Subtitle A of Title 26 is levied?
2. Does the legal requirement to file a Form 1040 and submit a Form W-4, as established by Treasury Decisions, apply to a U.S. citizen who earns wages from domestic sources entirely within one of the several states, and who is not engaged in any federally privileged activities (e.g., importing goods, selling alcohol, etc.)?
3. If such a citizen is required to participate in the income tax system, can you please provide the specific statutory and regulatory provisions, or Treasury Decisions, that create this obligation, reconciling it with the constitutional principle that an indirect tax must be upon a privilege and not a right?
I am not seeking to evade any lawful responsibility. I am seeking to understand what the law *is* so that I can follow it correctly. Your help in resolving this constitutional and administrative ambiguity would be of immense value to me and, I believe, to many of your constituents who strive to be compliant citizens.
Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. I look forward to your response.
Respectfully,
[Your Signature]
[Your Printed Name]
in other go-fuck-yourself news from your meaningless "civilization" and unexamined subconscious:
https://futurism.com/health-medicine/scientists-graft-human-ear-foot
Apparently, you - the taxpayer - are sub-nigger.
https://www.amren.com/podcasts/2025/12/at-the-learing-center/
commenter:
"They will never lear."
hahaha if it was funny.
The New Seccession is coming.
#racerealism is the missing and crucial element in this analysis.
#bitcoin is capped at 21m...
yet your pathetic ignorance still knows no bounds.
you are not an American until you learn the #law - #bitcoindoesnotfixthis shallow.
that's reserved for living men of dignity and integrity - i.e. character.
#bookstr
read it, faggot.
nostr:note1mchmqqa5eq8ghq2a4ug5cnfyyyf4k5e95upz7eh7ft9433suzhnsnzkdyg
never in history, perhaps, has there been a better time to highlight both the BINDING CONTRACTUAL LANGUAGE in your utterly abusive relationship with the federal government and its administrative state, compose some affadavits and notices, and set about reclaiming your name from such adhesion contracts by showing clearly their gross negligence and violations...
Examples:
- Federal government funded and fueled INVASION.
- Invaders stealing trillions of citizen tax dollars.
- DOGE Social Security corruption findings.
- Alien crime rampant!
- Indecipherable CODES !
- violation of "entanglement" provisions via tech-censorship influence.
- COVID VIOLATIONS!!!!
etc, etc, etc...
End the abusive relationship with your psychopathic, hateful, and destructive centralized hologram state.
#law
nostr:note17fkedj5yhdpn75x5sefly7nt3262pacp3c4dum4dd9nlpwkpzq5snp3wa4
#law #history #reconstruction #civilwar
FACTS ERASED FROM OUR HISTORY BOOKS . . .
• Victorian Southerners correctly viewed and described Reconstruction as a Yankee communist revolution.
• This communist revolution, Reconstruction, was actually the second stage of a vengeful and vicious two-part war that had been planned far in advance to destroy the South.
• During Reconstruction the Democrats (mainly Southerners) were Conservatives and the Republicans (mainly Northerners) were Liberals. (If you do not know this, neither the Civil War or Reconstruction will make the slightest bit of sense.)
• The original architect of Reconstruction, Liberal U.S. President Abraham Lincoln—despite his public words to the contrary—privately planned to subjugate then totally Northernize the South.
• After Lincoln's assassination Reconstruction was taken over by socialists and communists, radical members of the then Left-wing Republican Party.
• Southerners considered the 12 years between 1865 and 1877 an actual war, one they referred to as "The War of Reconstruction."
• As part of Reconstruction the Liberal North repeatedly violated the Constitution while committing countless outrages and crimes against the Conservative South, including robbery, destruction and seizure of private property, rape, and even murder; simultaneously, honest, well-respected, legally elected Southern officials were thrown out of office and replaced by non-taxpaying illiterates, unscrupulous carpetbaggers, and progressive Left-wing thugs.
• To maintain dictatorial control over Dixie, the new Radical Left Republican government, headed by Liberal U.S. President Ulysses S. Grant, illegally weaponized the police, the courts, and the military; unfortunately, the Grant administration intentionally aggravated the situation by establishing a policy of, not racial equality, but black supremacy, across the South.
• In order to defend themselves in this second war of widespread authoritarianism, lawlessness, corruption, and misgovernment, the South raised an underground counter-Reconstruction army of some 500,000 men (of all races), one known as the "Invisible Empire.”
• Thanks to the heroic efforts of traditional Southern men and women (and even a few Conservative Yankees—then Democrats), the Left's radical Reconstruction revolution ultimately failed.
• Many of the social, racial, and economic problems plaguing the U.S. today began during Reconstruction, and, in fact, the Left is still using the same nefarious tactics it did then, and for the same goal: the attainment of political supremacy.
For instance, as these words are being recorded in the Summer of 2023, the Left is calling on Reconstruction law (namely, the Enforcement Acts of 1870 and 1871, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment) to indict former President Donald Trump.
• Reconstruction of the South continues into the 21st Century with, for example, the tearing down of Confederate monuments, the banning of Confederate flags, the slander of Southern heroes, the misrepresentation of beloved Confederates, the desecration of Confederate graves, and the suppression of factual Southern history books like this one—which is already being censored and banned.
In his sweeping work Twelve Years in Hell: Victorian Southerners Expose the Myth of Reconstruction, 1865-1877, the author-editor, award-winning historian Lochlainn Seabrook, addresses these and hundreds of other issues related to the darkest, most shockingly debauched and tragic period in American history.
The real story, which thoroughly contradicts the manufactured one found in conventional history books, is told through the eyes of 125 individuals who lived through Reconstruction; mainly Southern men and women, but also a number of Yankees and even a few foreigners.
To aid the reader in what is for most people a confusing and little understood subject, Mr. Seabrook includes discussions on events and developments that occurred before and after Reconstruction, along with a fascinating in-depth introduction, hundreds of notes, an exhaustive index, an important appendix, an inclusive bibliography, and rare photos and illustrations from the time period, many with information-packed captions.
Based on eyewitness accounts and divided into two major sections, one comprised of essays, the second containing personal views, this is the only modern, purely Southern, historically accurate work on Reconstruction, and, like so many other books by Mr. Seabrook, is sure to become a classic in Southern literature.
nostr:note1ksll4nkwgmxlxy3mhvht3s0c7vr75pt65qfqcvqvedjy7rcjcrmq5rvtmr
One of YOUR biggest problems is that you do not even know your own history.
A #liberty minded American who does not thoroughly understand what happened during the Reconstruction years in the South is an actor.
That person, YOU, stands immediately to the LEFT (baphomet-style) of nearly complete and utter fucking USELESSNESS.
READ, cunt.
... or shut the fuck up with your mindless kvetching.
https://www.searavenpress.com/product-page/twelve-years-in-hell
#law #history #reconstruction