Avatar
makomichi the wolf of weeb street
fd5989ddfadd9e2af6ceb8b63942a9e31b37367e89917931ede3b2ea76823f10
Creator of Proof of Wolf (PoW). Investigative journalist exposing wolfgrills one fluffy tail at a time. 🐺 Opinions are not my own. 絵は無断使用転載AI禁止❌

OK, enough of the AI argument for today. My whole point boils down to this: just share your art and stop stressing over it. It'll only get worse if you keep worrying about it.

Lora trained on Nightshade. Results? Better images

nostr:npub1kade5vf37snr4hv5hgstav6j5ygry6z09kkq0flp47p8cmeuz5zs7zz2an An artist proposed to make very cancerous watermarks (first pic). Someone used a model to remove it lol

This is getting ridiculous. They make their stuff as cancerous-looking as possible instead of just admitting defeat.

Artists can't differentiate between AI-generated and manually drawn pictures https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/how-did-you-do-on-the-ai-art-turing

seeing Bitcoiners on Bluesky is so bizarre

Thanks for the sats. Turbo is a shark hors.

When he dies, he'll probably request that "Bitcoin is a scam" be inscribed on his grave.

I decided to do a bit of digging and found an account on Xitter called @toyxyz3 that's pro-AI. He and one of his followers went over the methods being used to "protect" art from AI training. Apparently, none of them work. Techniques like Nightshade, Glaze, Grains, Gaussian Blur, Watermarks, and Noise can all be filtered through existing methods. While these techniques may make the AI-generated image look a bit off, it can still end up looking better than the original mess that the artists posted. Artists are purposefully ruining their own content for no reason.