Avatar
ImYour Huckleberry
fef3efbbdf9176f9382a67b4eeb6bc4bfa8f5b4b1b39d7129fe07d97fc17371c
For the moment, let's leave religion out of this discussion. I will come back to it later. All Humans(people), by nature, have the same rights; not dependent on when, where, how, or what gender they are born. These Rights supersede all national affiliations and national laws. These are natural laws. They existed before there were governments and will remain after. First and foremost, All people own themselves. All people are entitled to the fruits of their own labor. All associations, transactions, contracts, agreements, sales, etc. of Any kind, for Any reason must be voluntary. (Non-Aggression Principle or NAP - Aggression/Coercion should not be used to force anyone to do, say, or agree to Anything. The ONLY time aggression may be used is in the defense of the life and rights of yourself (or others) from another party initiating aggression.) Theft of any kind is wrong. These represent my ETHICAL stance on way human society should be. I understand that this model of society does not exist on any large scale today and may not come to exist in my lifetime, but this is something to strive towards. _________________ So, what does this mean and how did I come to these beliefs? Human beings, by nature, have the right of Self Ownership: Nobody else can decide for you how you should live your life. Only You can decide what's best for you. There is no other person, no human authority, higher than yourself in your life. If you own yourself, then every other human being also has that same Self-Ownership. Therefore, You have No right to act as an authority on someone else's life without their consent. You can not tell someone else how to live their life without their consent. You can not use force or coercion on another person in any way, except in the defense of the life or property of another. THINK HARD HERE IF You have no RIGHT to dictate to the life of another person, THEN you have no ability to convey that right to somebody else (e.g. through an election, etc.) For Example: You have no RIGHT to take something that is mine. Since you don't have the RIGHT to take my stuff, you can not give that right to someone else to use on your behalf. So, you can not bestow the RIGHT (which we have already decided you don't have) on the government and call it a Tax. The concept of governance is that the people being governed confer their rights upon authority figures to act on their behalf VOLUNTARILY. But, you can only give what you already have. You CAN NOT confer to another person a right that you do not already have to use/exercise on your behalf. If you are NOT a voluntary participant in a nation, an agent of the government (tax collector, police officer, etc.) can not legitimately come to your house and have the RIGHT to take your stuff because nobody who voted for this person or put that person in charge had the authority to grant that right to begin with. Voluntary Associations: No person should be forced to participate in anything that they do not want to be a part of. That includes but is not limited to: Governments Religions Marriages Armed Forces Businesses Clubs or ANY OTHER group or activity for any reason. If you agree with these beliefs, if you share this ETHICAL stance then you might be surprised to know that you are an Anarchist/Voluntaryist. _______________ I used to say that I am proud to be an American. You can be proud of the people in your country, proud of the accomplishments and advances her people have made, and at the same time recognize that there are flaws inherent to the system. I think that our country was founded on good principles, but, over the years, these principles have been sidelined by the corporate and political interests of this world. At the time this country was conceived there were a great many difficulties to be overcome but there were fewer rules and laws. We believed in individual liberty and created a nation to protect that liberty. The founders did their best, but just as with all other things in this world, advances have been made and new ways of thinking have emerged. The founders did what they thought necessary at the time, but I highly doubt that they would be pleased at what their creation has become. Now, instead of listing the things we are Not allowed to do, it seems we list the things we Are allowed to do. The laws and regulations in place today are oppressive, tyrannical, and unnecessary. The "taxes" the government steals from us are excessive. The "taxes" collected from us are not put to good or even effective use. The use of our armed forces to promote our ECONOMIC interests is deplorable. Our whole system is CORRUPT. IN SHORT, we have turned into the very monster we fought so hard to escape. This Country is in dire need of a MAJOR shift in the way we do things. It is inevitable. If we don't fix the problem, the whole system is going to burn down on its own. And on its way down we will lose more and more of our liberty until it gets to the point where ANYTHING that the powers-that-be offer us will be better than our current situation. I believe that it is still possible to make a difference from within the system, but that it will not happen, so I prepare for the worst. The average American is blind to the problem. The average person cares less about freedom and more about security. Most people these days won't complain unless there is some major shift from their comfort zone. The average person would rather be told what to do than take control of their own fate, make their own decisions, and live with the consequences. They are Sheep. ___________ I am a Christian, not because my family is Christian or because all the cool people are Christian, but because I made that choice for myself after deep thought and study on the subject. Nobody forced me to make this decision. It is not POSSIBLE to force someone to be Christian/Muslim/Buddhist/etc. It is a belief one has. ________________ Do I think that there should be laws prohibiting behavior that I find immoral? Insofar as it does not involve anyone else or their property then No. 1) Speaking specifically about the United States: There is a very clear doctrine from the very beginning of the country that there shall be no officially sanctioned and endorsed religion in the USA. This creates a problem for the enacting and enforcing of laws that are based on moral principles based upon religious teachings and context. Which religion is to be the model for governmental morality? Christianity? Islam? Buddhism? To base a law on "Morality" is in direct conflict with our founding principles. There are many behaviors that I find morally wrong and think are ultimately damaging to the individual and society at large. But as long as those behaviors, decisions, and actions are confined to oneself and other voluntary participants then I do not think the government should be able to declare them legal or illegal. If you allow the government to base it's laws on a particular religious understanding of morality, then later that same government could later use a different religion as the model. We must base our laws on protection of life, liberty, and property only. Limit the government and attempt to prevent it's overreach. 2) Using laws to force morality: I don't believe in legislating morality. I don't think that someone who doesn't steal, simply because it it against the law, is a moral person. They are surely a pragmatic person, but moral? The moral person would not steal, regardless of the law, because they believe it to be wrong. A person's belief or lack thereof in a higher power is not and should not be dependent upon the laws currently in place in society. In fact, it could be argued that obedience to secular laws could make a person complacent and leave them vulnerable to a false sense of eternal security. I don't need laws to know Right from Wrong. __________________ Render unto Caesar... I pay my taxes. I don't want government thugs breaking down my door and hauling me off to a cage because I didn't want to let them steal the fruits of my labor. As long as the situation remains the same here I will continue to pay my taxes.

Dash Cameras can help you defend yourself in court, but they can also be used against you.

If you choose to use a dash camera then you should explore encryption options for that camera as well. The 5th amendment DOES NOT protect your recordings from unwanted inclusion in legal proceedings against you. Most cameras do not offer encryption.

This is a sticky situation because you can get in trouble for tampering with evidence, be held in contempt of court, have insurance claims denied, etc. if you fail to provide recording that the court knows you have. It can also make you look like you have something to hide (like pleading the 5th) when facing a jury. With all these things in mind, you will have to decide for yourself about the risk/reward for using and/or encrypting a dash camera.

Personally I would prefer to have the footage to prove my innocence.

If you do decide to have a dash camera, then you really need it to upload footage automatically to a remote drive. It might also be desirable to be able to live stream the video as well. It does you no good to have a recording if it can be taken and destroyed by the other party involved...

This product is advertised as being product independent. It should be able to be used in a non-encrypted camera and still encrypt your recordings.

https://www.swissbit.com/en/products/security-products/ishield-camera/

#DashCam #Encryption #LiveStream #5thAmendment #5A #Lawsuit #Law #Evidence

"What is Tails?"

Glad you asked. A privacy OS that fits on a thumb drive for people like Project Veritas that get roughed up and surveilled. But it also suitable for other privacy concerns.

If you had a password manager and wanted a spare copy of the db, this would be a nice place to back it up to for instance.

"Tails, or "The Amnesic Incognito Live System," is a security-focused Debian-based Linux distribution aimed at preserving privacy and anonymity. It connects to the Internet exclusively through the anonymity network Tor. The system is designed to be booted as a live DVD or live USB and leaves no digital footprint on the machine unless explicitly told to do so. It can also be run as a virtual machine, with some additional security risks. The Tor Project provided financial support for its development in the beginnings of the project, and continues to do so alongside numerous corporate and anonymous sponsors...."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tails_(operating_system)

https://amrron.com/2016/05/02/security-the-down-and-dirty-guide/

https://tails.boum.org/

#SecureOS #TravelDrive #TOR #Debian #Linux #Privacy #Private #Anonymous #FOSS #OpenSource

When times are tough, you can save money by cooking for yourself. Learn to use what you have effectively.

This is the way...

https://grandpappy.org/indexrec.htm

#HardTimes #Cook #Recipe #Grandpappy #Preparedness #Frugal

“The law is an opinion with a gun.”

--Stefan Molyneux (24 September 1966 - living)

Freedomain Radio - Podcast

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Molyneux

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #StefanMolyneux #FreedomainRadio #Law #Gun #Violence #Coercion

"There is one and only one principle, on which you can build a true, rightful, enduring and progressive civilization, which can give peace and friendliness and contentment to all differing groups and sects into which we are divided—and that principle is that every man and woman should be held by us all sacredly and religiously to be the one true owner of his or her faculties, of his or her body and mind, and of all property, inherited or — honestly acquired. There is no other possible foundation — seek it wherever you will — on which you can build, if you honestly mean to make this world a place of peace and friendship, where progress of every kind, like a full river fed by its many streams, may flow on its happy fertilizing course, with ever broadening and deepening volume. Deny that self-ownership, that self-guidance of the individual, and however fine our professed motives may be, we must sooner or later, in a world without rights, become like animals who prey on each other.

** Deny human rights, and however little you may wish to do so, you will find yourself abjectly kneeling at the feet of that old-world god, Force — that grimmest and ugliest of gods that men have ever carved for themselves out of the lusts of their hearts;**

you will find yourselves hating and dreading all other men who differ from you; you will find yourselves obliged by the law of conflict into which you have plunged, to use every means in your power to crush them before they are able to crush you; you will find yourselves day by day growing more unscrupulous and intolerant, more and more compelled by the fear of those opposed to you, to commit harsh and violent actions, of which you would once have said 'Is thy servant a dog taht he should do these things?'; you will find yourselves clinging to and welcoming Force, as the one and only form of protection left to you, when you have destroyed the rule of the great principles."

--Auberon Herbert (Auberon Edward William Molyneux Herbert; 18 June 1838 - 5 November 1906)

Voluntaryist Creed: Being the Herbert Spencer Lecture Delivered at Oxford (1906)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auberon_Herbert

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #AuberonHerbert #SelfOwnership #Force #Violence #Slavery #LifeLibertyProperty

“Shame on the men who can court exemption from present trouble and expense at the price of their own posterity’s liberty!”

--Samuel Adams (27 September 1722 - 2 October 1803)

Article signed Candidus, 3 February 1776 (W.V. Wells - The Life of Samuel Adams, vol ii pp. 360-363)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Adams

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #SamuelAdams

“1. That the disposal of their own property is the inherent right of freemen; that there can be no property in that which another can, of right, take from us without our consent”

--Samuel Adams (27 September 1722 - 2 October 1803)

The Philadelphia Resolutions; The Pennsylvania gazette, 16 October 1773

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Adams

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #SamuelAdams #Taxation #Theft #Consent #LifeLibertyProperty #PropertyRights

"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

...

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

--Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (born Michael King Jr.; 15 January 1929 - 4 April 1968)

"I Have a Dream" March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on August 28, 1963

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King_Jr.

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #MLK #MartinLutherKingJr #Dream #IHaveADream #Equal #SelfEvident #Color #Character

“There is no worse tyranny than to force a man to pay for what he does not want merely because you think it would be good for him.”

-- Robert A. Heinlein (July 7, 1907 – May 8, 1988)

The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, 1966

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #Heinlein #RobertAHeinlein #Tyranny #Taxes #Voluntary #Consent

#ConspiracyTheory #Truth #Fnords

I agree that he was hypocritical in this aspect, but which would have been worse:

A) allowing the southern states to secede and retain the practice of slavery

or

B) fight a war and end slavery in the process?

Yes, I know that he stated that he would rather keep the union intact than end slavery. I also know that many of those who fought the war did not do so with the purpose of ending slavery.

What is the correct politicl answer?

What is the correct moral answer?

A person who is wrong 100 times can still be right once...

You left out the MOST important commandment that sums all of these up.

Matthew 22:37

"And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.""

In so doing you will also "love your neighbor as yourself" because loving God requires you to love your neighbor...

that depends entirely upon the individuals in those camps choosing freely to participate. The biggest problem we will face there is that most people have abdicted their decision making responsibilities to the leadership of their camps. Thus they will both see us as a threat.

It will take people waking up and I fear that won't happen until some kind of real national crisis is underway (war, civil war, obvious undeniable financial collapse, martial law, etc...)

#DividedWeFall #DivideAndConquer #DivideAndRule #Sheep

"We do not commonly see in a tax a diminution of freedom, and yet it clearly is one."

--Herbert Spencer (27 April 1820 - 8 December 1903)

The Principles of Ethics (pp. 241-43), 1887

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Spencer

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #HerbertSpencer #Freedom #Tax #Ethics

"Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world."

--Abraham Lincoln (12 February 1809 - 15 April 1865), POTUS

Speech in United States House of Representatives: The War with Mexico, 12 January 1848

(full text) https://papersofabrahamlincoln.org/documents/D200444

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #AbrahamLincoln #Licoln #POTUS #Revolution #LibertyTree

"You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once."

--Robert A. Heinlein (July 7, 1907 – May 8, 1988)

Time Enough for Love, June 1973

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein

#QuoteOfTheDay #LibertyQuote #Quote #Quotes #Liberty #RobertAHeinlein #Heinlein #Peace #Freedom

"Opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated"

I heard this today and it struck a cord in me...

#opportunity #responsibility #SituationalAwareness #Quote