Session is far superior to SimpleX group chats which don’t scale. You’re only biased to SimpleX because you hate any crypto other than Bitcoin, which is ironically your form of censorship.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Sesion compared to Simplex is crap with respect to privacy, p2p programs are not good at preserving privacy.

It also works terribly.

First off Session isn’t peer-to-peer. It’s peer-to-node, working like a crypto-powered Tor.

Second, SimpleX is closer to peer-to-peer with group chats requiring each member to crypto-handshake with the other ones, which is why it doesn’t scale. Our group chat has 230 or 250 people depending on whose client you’re looking at, because the handshakes aren’t going through to all members.

Third, Session’s unique DNS enables it to hop from device to device if the server’s location is discovered, making it completely separated from physical locations. We’ve created original server-side code for this, which you can find out about here,

http://simplifiedprivacy.com/uncensored

Anyone can set up a Simplex server, almost no one can set up a session node because of the cost.

If I don't run the server, I don't run the code.

There are two issues, censorship and privacy.

I disagree with this view for censorship, as here the issue is who owns the domain name.

With SimpleX, it's the government.

With Session, its the end user with private keys to their blockchain entry.

Thank you both for the great insights !