Replying to Avatar mister_monster

No. I don't have a critique. My point is only what I've said. Two satoshis aren't necessarily interchangable. This means they're not fungible. That is all I've said.
Avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭 5mo ago

(Answer to only this note, since I would have to read into what is fungibility first)

But when I hold dirty coins to say and now send them to a silent address (BIP-352), would they still be distinguishable by network analysis?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
mister_monster 5mo ago

I'm not familiar enough with BIP-352 to be able to answer that definitively, but I do know that you can see when coins come from such an address, so they get treated like dirty coins regardless if they are or not.

Avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭 5mo ago

But BIP-352 is diffrent. They bring complete privacy to Bitcoin through cryptography. You have a single adress to give away, while every sender will send the bitcoins to a diffrent address. Cakewallet uses it already, if you want to try it.

As far as I have heared this brings perfect privacy to Bitcoin without making the holding addresses any diffrent from other adresses.