Replying to Avatar verbiricha

According to spec that tag is used in kind 1. NIP-23 uses kind 30023 and clearly defines expected tags. I'm fine supporting both but other clients might not even show it if it doesn't have a title.
Avatar
Mike Dilger ☑️ 2y ago

I'll go ahead and code it even as it seems redundant.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Blake 2y ago

I wondered why we had both too. Ideally it would just be title shared for all cases that need a header for an event.

Avatar
bu5hm4nn 2y ago

I'm sure it was just an oversight. In my reading most people including myself do not have a complete overview of NIPS (especially as so much of it is in the PR's and issues and not the actual repo). Maybe we should submit a PR to harmonize. IMHO we need to do breaking changes to tidy up nostr spec now before things get so big it becomes impossible.