Migrating is not about violence or intrusion. Since when it would be violent or without consent, it was criminal.
But it is obvious, that migration can happen without violence. Most people migrate for some opportunity. Most of the time the violent part is the one not allowing this opportunity. Not the one trying to make use of it.
Migration creates a social burden that someone has to pay. That is without consent and thus violent. The support of governments to migrants has a cost which must be paid.
Likewise more labour equals lower wages, etc etc. The economic are straight forward.
Migration simply doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Only when you can respect and consider your fellow man will you be able to see the full picture.
You wise man. Where do growing companies get their work force within a country that has a birthrate below 2?
Another straw man. Birth rate is unrelated.
And I don’t base my opinions off of the ability for companies to profit. Morals trump profiteering. One person getting a job at the cost of others losing it isn’t a trade off I’d back.
Why you assume that someone needs to loose a job, so an other one can get one?
You know what entrepreneurs do? Economy is no 0-sum-game. Economies are ecosystems with lots of symbiosis. Driving value for an economy are human needs. And the need for a job is quiet an existencal one for those who are not wealthy enough to not follow a payed work.
