I do not know why they do not do this. But would not be a better solution. Killing and threatening people is bad. Period.
Discussion
threatening aggression is not the same as threatening retribution for acts that are being planned to perform
these people should be at risk of being shot in the head, on the spot, as they drive their car over innocent people, that's not a threat of aggression, that's a threat of retribution
it works, that's why there is almost no street crime in Wyoming - 2/3 of the people are strapped
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/04/26/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/
Here would be a source to show gun death by state in the USA. As to answer to your wyoming claim. It is among the top 5 states in death commited with arms.
pew... cited by the best propaganda rags like wapo and nyt
it's not even that easy to find real data on this shit because of how much of the commie disarmament of individuals agenda is so heavily funded by USAID and Soros et al
before i'm gonna even bother to read such a thing i want to see who pays them to do it
same shit with drugs too... almost always corruption just one layer under the surface
i know what it looks like in Philadelphia and New York and Los Angeles and Chicago, and all of those famously messed up cities are run by gun grabbing democrats and are riddled with drug addiction and massive scale petty crime
also, in the very first sentence it gives away the game
CDC
oh yeah, they did so well protecting us all from fraudulently promoted, coercive forced government purchase of phizer, moderna, johnson and johnson experimental gene therapy
remember, CDC told doctors to call it death by covid if the PCR said it, even if that only meant they had been exposed and were immune
as if they are gonna tell the straight story about anything
Lets bring you a source with numbers, that are better proofen please. This is so easy. When you do not approve these sources, at least bring an alternative source. When you not trust this source on people death by guns, come with a research that goes about the same question and is within your world of trust.
i just think it's obvious that people don't do as much crime if they are at risk of being shot at
and if you take away people's guns the bad guys switch from guns to cars and baseball bats
For you this is obvious. For me not.
I am quiet certain, that from the core human are constructive. And there are ill people and narcisist, which learned to act different. But it is far from natural for a human to kill an other human being.
I look at the numbers. And they seem not to support your claim. So either the numbers or your claim have some issues.
you just don't understand how conditioning and training work
i'm a bit surprised but i guess they ended compulsory service in switzerland then?
I know what conditioning can have of effect. But I assume our difference is in a total different aspect. I assume, that any human being is naturally empathic, willing to help others without asking for compensation. That gifting someone is nothing exceptional but rather the norm.
And all egoism is something human have to learn from the society. To be selfcentric is something we learn.
I base this claim on the reality, that rarely people attack eachother. Even more rare is a physical attack. Most people know, that respecting others property helps securing order in a society. Therefore most people do not steal. I don't see the reason in fear of punishment. But rather in our friendly nature and the understanding that we all profit from friendly behaviour, while everyone looses in a system where the most violent wins.
Over the decades humanity always tends to soften more. Every generation tends to be more friendly and less violent. It is natural selction. Survival of the friendliest.
You have different beleave there. And I think this is where we differe. The rest is only symptoms of this very basic idea, of what is natural human behaviour.