Can be that this is a legitimation, russia uses. But I do not beleafe in them. Any human which can listen to what Putin says and how lawenforcement is reacting on anti-war-activities in russia, knows that Putin is not liberating anyone. He is lying and it is easy to understand propaganda.

On the other side, I see very legitimate wishes of free people and countries. Would you say an authoritarian president has the legitimation to give orders to free people? Should democracies kneel in front of a weak authoritarian country? Should any country accept that a neighbour country enters their borders with military?

I am defnitly for freedom. Freedom of thoughts and freedom from violence. Putin is against those two freedoms. Putin brought violence over his people and brings violence over Ukraine. Which parts of this can you argue against? And please argue against my points. Not just start any new discussion. Any kind of evading the discussion, will discredit you.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Hi, thanks, Putin being a dictator does not mean NATO expansion isn’t at least in part to blame. Many options to not start that war were on the table. UK and US encouraged Ukraine to dismiss them.

Biden’s US, and current top of EU would fight Russia until the last Ukrainian. Everyone is making money, who cares about all the men dying!

I appreciate the opposing view :)