>Since Black Holes are responsible for rotations at the speed of light, I’m starting to think that we can harness its antimatter to travel far lengths in within the Universe. Many stars escape the center.

It is interesting that this has become such a popular thread. But let's walk through this a bit.

BTW, I'm not a physisict, astromoner, or anything of the kind. I just read and study a lot.

1. It is possible for the event horizon of a black hole to spin at the speed of light; though this is not necessary. Many spin far slower.

2. Given that the event horizon is a boundary in three dimensions, and not a physical object with mass, the word "spin" is a bit misleading. The BH has angular momentum, and the rate of rotation of the mass of the black hole at the radius of the event horizon is informally said to be the "spin" of the event horizon. Indeed, it is because the event horizon is not a physical object with mass that it can spin at c.

3. There is no antimatter necessarily associated with black holes -- at least outside the event horizon. Inside the event horizon the math suggests (but does not prove) that objects travel backwards in time. You can model an anti-particle as a regular particle moving backwards in time so... there's that.

4. Anti-matter is as energy dense as any fuel can be. That makes it a tempting hypothetical fuel for propulsion. However, there may be better mechanisms. For example, the Bussard Ramjet does not need to carry any fuel at all, except for initial accelleration and decelleration. So whereas an antimatter ship would be very poweful indeed, it would still have a limited range. The ramjet's range is only limited by the density of hydrogen in "empty" space.

5. I do not understand the statement: "Many stars escape the center."