Thanks, I just spotted that too.
>From: semisol at 05/15/23 11:25:43 on wss://atlas.nostr.land
>---------------
>the note in the `description` tag
Thanks, I just spotted that too.
>From: semisol at 05/15/23 11:25:43 on wss://atlas.nostr.land
>---------------
>the note in the `description` tag
Was about to tell you I figured it out but realized you were a step ahead of me.
Maybe the NIP could be made clearer?
;-) What fun would _that_ be? ;-)
>From: jsm<-DerekRoss at 05/15/23 12:10:41 on wss://relay.damus.io
>---------------
>Was about to tell you I figured it out but realized you were a step ahead of me.
>
>Maybe the NIP could be made clearer?
Lol.
I’ll admit it, it was honestly kind of fun making raw requests to relays and parsing the JSON output in the CLI.
The bottom line is that the "description" tag of the 9735 Zap Receipt seems to contain the json string of the 9734 Zap request. The "pubkey" field of the Zap request is the sender of the zap. However, at least some of the wallets seem to delete the "amount" tag of that Zap request; and so the amount of the zap is lost.
I'll write up a blurb about this for NIP-57 and do a pull request. My luck getting PRs into the main-line has not been great, so we'll see.