Nostr Web Client

Yes, but let me just say that many other edit NIP proposals also share the name "nip37" so we might be confusing some readers.

I guess instead of the warning text talking about NIP-37 the popup confirmation could say something like: "This may cause existing comments and reactions to this note to disappear in some clients. Read more."

fiatjaf 1y ago

I am not sure if I like the tweaked-delete-and-replace flow more or if I prefer the annotations-with-benefits spec for small typo fixes (this one: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/issues/1569#issuecomment-2462978430). The second would have to enforce some limits to the amount of characters replaced in order to be decent.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

SwBratcher 1y ago

I enjoyed the back and forth in the linked discussion. I tend to take this perspective since we cannot guess all current use cases or predict all future client needs:

- Protocol allows key flexible functionality in a scalable framework.

- Clients provide full or limited access to functionality based on their use case goals.