I think it could be similar to when IEEE/ISO delegates discuss the RFCs. So only the invited people can connect to the event.

Or - more closer - BIP discussions (i think it will not lead to soft/hard fork :-) ).

It’s not really a critique—based on my own experience, after a few years, any project benefits from introspection to reassess whether its structure is sustainable over time.

Without referencing any specific NIP, as my goal isn’t to offer unwarranted criticism, I believe that some could be considered non-essential and lack practical use.

I think this is a healthy debate.