I'll pass it for nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn to answer this.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

https://habla.news/u/hodlbod@coracle.social/8YjqXm4SKY-TauwjOfLXS

Outbox doesn't strictly improve discovery of notes. Pre-outbox, we might have had better success, but only because we were relying on centralization. Outbox is the only way to decentralize and scale simultaneously. And for it to work, people who want it to work for their notes have to do the following:

- Publish a kind 10002 which points to relays that do in fact satisfy the purpose of nip 65 (write relays should be public read, or at least readable to people you want to see your stuff; read relays should be public write, or at least writable by people you want to be able to contact you)

- Migrate past notes to new relays when changing relay selections

- Use clients that provide relay hints in case of censorship

- Use clients that provide pubkey hints so that quotes and parent notes can be dereferenced using outbox

Right now, not a lot of clients do much of this. The ones that do have buggy implementations. So currently outbox doesn't work, and doesn't really exist. But I reiterate, it's the only way to decentralize and scale.

Also that Habla link there is not very nostric.

Sorry, I meant to turn it into a njump link

Oh… And rate limit relay responses.

Nostr still young and vulnerable.

note1e8qxtf6zj2ec28tdcr3z3l7hsaeasza3u8pzntj982vn56p6cn6st4g09m

Migration should probably be done via DVMs