So the workaround was better than the original intent.
But I'd say underscores have existed much before italics because ancient copists used them when types weren't a thing and therefore no one had thought about italics.
So the workaround was better than the original intent.
But I'd say underscores have existed much before italics because ancient copists used them when types weren't a thing and therefore no one had thought about italics.
Which is better is an opinion, of course. Although I love the typographic conventions of traditional books that in my opinion peaked mid-century, I totally understand your frustration with someone else deciding that your underscores "really mean" something else -- and then forcing you into the something else with no way out.