Sorry bro, disagree. Proper solution is to support zaps independently of LN Adress.
So you can both receive sats privately + as zaps, dependning on who wishes to send where.
Sorry bro, disagree. Proper solution is to support zaps independently of LN Adress.
So you can both receive sats privately + as zaps, dependning on who wishes to send where.
Disabling zaps doesn't stop you from receiving sats
No, but puts the onus on receiver
Whereas "zaps toggle" sounds like sender feature