Replying to Avatar .

Claiming Ashigaru Whirlpool can steal funds is not quite correct. If I grant you your claim, then what you propose is more that the coordinator potentially charge a different fee than the 5% of the pool size when the USER initiates a Tx0.

The coordinator can't simply sweep a user's wallet as your claim of potential theft seems to imply.

If the Scode function of alternate fees was removed, by what mechanism does the coordinator have to charge a different fee than what is displayed in the terminal?
Avatar
lontivero 6mo ago

My note is extremely clear and it doesn't allow you to imply that the coordinator can sweep a user's wallet.

Exactly, by not verifying the info the client opens the door to a malicious coordinator to potentially charge a different fee than the 5% (steal).

You could agree with me that removing the Scode was the correct thing to do, right? Could you agree also that checking how much fee a user has to pay is the correct thing to do? Or, do you prefer to let that to the users?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
lontivero 6mo ago

nostr:npub1ak68qfcjj7k95c0jwleu69x72nr8adwv6g80pkwl9xlps6zmkqzqrxy8fx clarified this and the idea is to not support multiple coordinators. There will be one coordinator developed, maintained and run by the same team that Ashigaru users already trust. This means that nobody needs to worry about the coordinator charging a coordination fee other than the promised 5%.