Discussion
Factors that corrupt science are explained/exposed in that video.
What is not clear is how much those factors affect the science. Is modern science totally corrupted by funding biases, publication biases, etc, or is it only a little bit corrupted, or somewhere in between? It is hard to say without empirical data on science itself. What we get in youtube videos is cherry-picked.
If I were to take a guess, however, I would guess that certain topics are a lot more corrupted than others, and climate change is one of those. Add to that media bias and misunderstand which is clear and rampant and please please please don't trust the news about climate change.
However, even within the topic of climate change, there is good research going on and good people trying to discover the truth because that is the core of their soul and the core of what makes them tick. And many of them believe there are significant costs associated with letting the globe warm too much (even as there are also benefits), and that there are no known practical mechanisms for removing the increased CO2 from the atmosphere anytime soon, and therefore caution would indicate that we should try to limit this thing.
there is good science. But only the bad get big funding and specially BIG midia.
and most of the climate change science take man-made climate change as PREMISE, not conclusion. the whole thing rests upon a few fraudulent results and datasets.
there were various letters signed by hundreds or thousands of cientists against the narrative, the whole concept of man-made climate change since decades ago, totally ignored by midia, government, etc.
the whole problematic around CO2 and temperature is fake. CO2 was much larger before, and greenhouses pump more CO2, plants thrive with more CO2. Volcanos throw much more CO2 than men. (remember volume maters, x^3).
And the earth was both cooler and warmer in recorded history, small variations is normal stuff. There were wine in England in roman times, and the Thames froze in the little modern ice age a few centuries ago.
We should move away from fossil fuel and move on to nuclear at regional level and solar for private homes. We should stop consuming bullshit products that are shipped from China all over the place. And CO2 produced in mobility of people and goods should get priced in, yes by tax. I live in an area where lots of cucumbers are produced. Still, cucumbers from 1500 km away are way cheaper. Silly.