From: pablof7z<-DerekRoss at 06/11/23 10:16:11 on wss://atlas.nostr.land

CC: #[4]

CC: #[5]

CC: #[6]

CC: #[7]

>---------------

> You can perfectly do that and in fact you could argue that’s one use case of highlighter.com; I see myself doing that to pull out specific things to reply to on kind 1s.

That may be.

>

> But including the whole content you’re replying to embedded in the content looks bad and breaks the structured data formatting of nostr events (increases parsing complexity/ambiguity).

It's up to the author if they want to include the whole content. It's easy enough to edit out the things that don't apply.

>

> Why not create specific event kind:1 tagging the content you’re replying to and allow threading to do its magic?

Oh I think we should all do that. More-speech certainly does. I just don't think that's sufficient for the application of discussion topics and debate.