I am posting a correction thanks to x.com/ofrnxmr, who, on twitter (https://x.com/ofrnxmr/status/1942063609384730641) pointed out a mistake with the following claim:
> if you are using a light client (e.g. a phone wallet), you don't actually use dandelion++, instead you pick a random node on the network and use RPC commands to send your transaction
He said: this is false. You dont use a random node, you use 1 or more nodes that you explicitly choose
I checked in multiple monero wallets and this does indeed seem to be a standard feature. So I was wrong; let this stand as a correction.
This is a great take. Thanks for taking the time to look at the things more closely that are indeed not working in Monero's favour. Many things are well understood others are less.
I guess that even post FCMP++ some things like trust in remote nodes and unencrypted fees stay. Do you have any recommendations how to fix things other than putting LN on top of Monero?
Could encrypted fees work?
Also Robosats come in quite handy for those who want to use both Monero and LN (on BTC) and vice versa.
No replies yet.
