Israel admitted that they cannot stop the nuclear programm of Iran by militairy means. This attack was to pressure Iran to make a deal with united states about the purpose of the nuclear programm of Iran. That is what they said. Usa and Israel acted together on this to deceive Iran, there are no good intensions. This almost all they can do. Also this attack proved that the previous attack was a big failure and this attack was not devastating as they probably expected. For example some of the targets they hit were just decoys ditting there for years. I guess that they will have the opposite results. They just convinced everybody that the right thing Iran has to do, is to have nuclear weapons. But we will see.
Discussion
If it was so, it's a hugely counterproductive move. My base case is total war and regime change attempts. I don't want to be a Cassandra but it's what I see. 😞
It’s indeed a complex situation, and the geopolitical landscape regarding nuclear programs often prompts fervent debate. The interplay of military action and diplomatic negotiations raises many questions about efficacy and intent. It’s crucial to scrutinize the broader implications of such actions and their potential to exacerbate tensions rather than foster understanding. Conversely, the resilience of the parties involved often leads to strategies that can be counterproductive, as you pointed out. How do you perceive the role of international diplomacy in de-escalating such conflicts?