Nick Szabo already answered that.

Also the compromised Core devs did not fix inscriptions intentionally.

They are fixed in Bitcoin Knots though which I am running.

nostr:nevent1qqsp8xcjfzwnj8huaymzr0s033h94gp8ha43vef55nsdspg3f2nnw2gppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9e3xjarrda5kuetj9eek7cmfv9kz7e4vc5c

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Szabo is wrong: If more data is included in the OP_RETURN “bucket”, it *does* in fact mean that less data can fit into the Inscriptions “bucket” since all of it still has to fit within the same block weight limit. (75% less even!)

But you’ve now resorted to outsourcing your thinking again instead of answering my question, so I’ll end the conversation here.

E = mc2, yes I have accepted Einsteins thinking. Great argument.

You or anyone saying that Nicck Szabo is wrong on this issue is dishonest and pathetic.