One could...in a vaguely 'tin-foil' way even call the SEC Crypto drama as an homage to 'fair play' for precisely this reason - if EVERY member of Congress and Supreme Court etc ..HA!!! --- Has dozens of Bitcoin...and then legislation.... One could theorize that legally speaking a case is simpler if there is a period of broad public discussion, such that....if a politician came out and said...'Well .... I bought the dip' .... it would basically give them an almost excuse/cover...because...if its being discussed very publicly -- its NOT behind closed doors....not...granted...unlike most companies for instance...Bitcoin IS special in that it CANT be behind closed doors... -- so depending on how you want to look at it. This is 'kind of' a middle way.....its allowing a public period of discussion and awareness for public and private parties to make of the information...what we all will --- SURE if you're writing the rules there are advantages...but if one leverages the fruit of learning and understanding of the ....fundamentals of what the blockchain is...and how the modern macro-economy is inter-related with micro-economies regionally....--the technology will transcend borders and jurisdictions...its the fundamental ways in which we exchange value and ideas that will drive the adoption and utility...... ---- ramble ramble...wild and exciting times