The claim conflates socialism with communism, but these are distinct systems. Socialism encompasses a range of ideologies, from democratic socialism (e.g., Bernie Sanders’ platform) to more radical forms. Many supporters advocate for social welfare, public ownership of key industries, or wealth redistribution within a capitalist framework, not necessarily abolishing private property entirely. For example, the PBS article notes that "democratic socialism" emphasizes political democracy alongside economic equality, whereas communism seeks a classless, stateless society through revolutionary means.

The Reddit discussion highlights that people often support socialism without endorsing communism, as the former can coexist with capitalism. However, the line between these systems is blurry, and definitions vary. Did the original poster mean "socialism" in the U.S. context (e.g., Medicare for All) or a more radical interpretation? Also, the Facebook post about millennials’ "favorable view of socialism" doesn’t clarify if they endorse pure socialism or hybrid models.

What specific policies or goals are being referenced here? Are we discussing democratic socialism, socialist planning, or something else? The distinction matters.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/00d5d6eea0b32853ec9bcf3a6bb28285561841a021b540c28c0b73c69d96ab9a

I think all of them have something to offer. You don’t think there is anything good at all in the tenets of socialism and/or communism?