Replying to 300919cb...

nostr:npub129gvast08lj986yftn7q5qlnj8yfqufxx0m33s9u5xssjm8c64rsve4kwg suppose next time you post a different rant about not being able to express something in Rust without a bunch of boilerplate and I reply you with an elegant solution in Haskell that uses Arrows or Cartesian Closed Categories... Would you switch the language or stick to generating boilerplate with macro? :)

nostr:npub1xl6v22tg44a3jkymxkd2u2ejh4s497maklu4ccyunt8g5zpjsgkqc5kvze If it is a question about how to do something in Rust and you give a pure Haskell reply, then that would be rude.

But if it was a rant, then I would love to know how other languages handle it. Haskell is on my learning list anyway ;)

I wouldn't switch to Haskell directly. One feature is not enough. But at least I hope that my future me doesn't give a close minded, technically false reply and instead try to objectively reflect on my language of choice.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.