There is no scenario where you mandate vaccines, because a good vaccine protects the recipient.
With a good vaccine, the people who choose to get that protection are removed from the problem, they are literally immune to the problem and thus have no basis to mandate others to do anything.
A bad vaccine, one that doesn’t protect the recipient… why would you mandate that? What does that achieve?
Sam Harris is trapped in a paradox and doesn’t seem to recognise his broken train of thought. Also, he looks ill, is he OK?