ICYMI
By “comments bellow” I simply mean another branch of this thread, in which I address your points above.
(See if this works to make a link … here’s me PASTING a note ID and prefacing it with “nostr:” ala NIP-27 specs)
nostr:note1zjtzt45jp37n7df336ggktt8kzulxe4s6pegd946rtvrgvyaevrs98rcll
So…
NIP-27 style URLs work across multiple clients to cross-link posts and comments from various threads. But I don’t see nostr:npub18m76awca3y37hkvuneavuw6pjj4525fw90necxmadrvjg0sdy6qsngq955 or nostr:npub1cyvdrwq55epxvucwwhmvz8zll2tdq6qml6jef4tykslnp9up8pzqp3ljam clients (that I use) implementing links to “share this post” in this manner.
Why is that?
If it’s only UX issues… they should be addressed.
UX benefits would include :
- open links in the SAME client
- open links (to other kinds) in user specified APPROPRIATE client.
- become aware of “back links” to any given post, the moment it is rendered.
- AND overall improvement toward “social productivity”, which is my term for one’s ability to extract and build upon useful information found in random social media threads.
nostr:note1q8utaa24dgs5lthnx2utx4ckz2wcmm79jcz5tjc292tp69f8r8eqgzj4yv
