Great interview. They covered so much and I had forgotten all about this part.
https://v.nostr.build/mVtF8yXSdJkb2RJ0.mp4
#bullishbounty
Discussion
Yeah, these films were propaganda for “the Russians” 😂
Mind blowing. Had no idea
Read Death Object and watch The Nuclear Scare Scam and put the pieces together - nuclear bombs are pure fiction
I'm convinced the WW2 USA vs Japan atomic bombs were fictional.
I'm also convinced nuclear generation of electricity is possible.
It is surprising that several different countries would play along with the nuclear bomb hoax if there's literally nothing to it.
Consider the possibility that few in the elite circles that understand the hoax are transnational, and that all civilian governments are being duped. Consider the Atomic Secrecy Act. Consider the non-proliferation treaties.
Competition between Coke and Pepsi is an important fiction. For all intents and purposes, they are not competing but working together to keep people addicted to sugar. It’s easy to see this with political parties, of course, and even many normies recognize the “uniparty”.
But for my money, the City of London financial elite do this same thing with entire nations.
Have you read any Antony Sutton?
I have not
He was studying and noticed that the Soviet Union could not have existed at all without technology transfers from the West. Communists can’t innovate at all. Example: they made the exact same camera lenses totally unchanged from 1945 (when they stole the Carl Zeiss designs from the Germans) until 1991.
He dug deeper and realized that the Soviet Union was never a genuine competitor of the US, but rather a totally captive market open only to the few major western corporations blessed to do business with the “enemy”.
Another big example he points to is the invasion route that Soviet tanks took into Afghanistan. It was built by the US army corps of engineers. 😂
Sounds crazy at first but I’m open to it. Thanks for recs
Posting this podcast in any way is instant unfollow for me. Rogan is no support in the search of reality.
That's one fundamentalist attitude. If you exclude a source of information without verifying its content yourself, you run the risk of believing something false. If you're convinced of your truth, then false information can't change that.
Weird. He covers so many different topics and has a wide variety of guests. 🤷♂️
I just read about him. This seems to be true, that he seems to have had podcasts with all kind of people. I do not know, if false conspiracy theorist searched him or if he searched to be close to false conspiracy theorist. But undoubtedly he decided to be close to false conspiracy theories like the one you posed, instead of being on the search for facts.
I like to follow critical thinkers. Rogan is obviously no critical thinker. And I am doubtful if any real critical thinker can still follow his show.
I totally hear you. But I disagree. Rogan has 3 hour conversations with some of the world’s great minds. I don’t always agree. And sometimes it goes off the rails but there’s real nuggets of knowledge in there. But the format of free flowing conversation with little regard for what is socially acceptable is not for everyone.
Thanks for your explanation. I just feel, there is no lack of good information in our world. It is easy to only consume information from sources, which work hard to have a clean reputation. Everyone slips and makes mistakes. This is no problem.
For me it is only a problem, when someone makes a mistake, gets feedback about it and is not willing to excuse for it and correct it.
Whatever person that is able to say sorry and improve, I am happy to trust. And there is absolutely no additional value when someone invests time in reading and listening thoughts of people who do not try their best to keep their content down to earth, backed by facts.
Same with reading books. There is no need, to finish books, that are boring. Too many great books in the world to invest this time. I feel every minute I invest in content that has some valuable information, while I could invest the same time in more valuable content, is a waste of my time.
Clearly everyone needs some time to understand if a source is valuable to them or not. To me Joe Rogan is defnitly not. I like Jordan Harbinger much more, when it comes to a podcaster, that invites a variety of people. Jordan reads Books of the people he invites to prepare himself. Therefore he is prepared to keep the conversation at a high informative value. And I rarely see him go down the slippery road.
Haven’t heard of Jordan but I’ll check him out.
I have just seen that he offers very good guidance on his website. Just find what is intresting for you. Since you are your best captain I am sure.😉🙌💪
I am not able to post the whole link. Just navigate to podcast starterpacks in his website to filter for your intrests.
Appreciate the rec! And I always appreciate a civilized and intelligent debate like this. Thank you