i have a model that suggests that in addition to the well known orbital electrons, atoms also have long-orbit electrons that are spin pairs and they are the mechanism that creates a "surface tension" where as these clouds interact with each other, they push the matter they orbit closer together to reduce the tension in the cloud

magnetic fields are a similar phenomenon, except they form distinct threads that are in pairs one forward one backwards (opposite spin, opposite orbit direction)

the principle is that those neutral pairs i first mention that create the surface optimization force that we call gravity, additionally form other types of structures than the clouds and bidirectional magnetic flux lines, and they can convey signals instantaneously because - well, as you know, electrons (and photons, in general) don't actually have mass - because they are transmitters of mass, and electric current, for example, flows by the coincidence of magnetic fields - there is a simple experiment that proves this, you make a power circuit with a battery on one side, and the light on the other, but the wires are like 5 miles each out and back, and when you time the delay between the power being connected to the light responding to the power, it is far sooner than if the electrons had to do that loop to carry the energy - meaning that it is the magnetic field that does the energy transfer and in fact something is going on that transmits the energy through the air but it's not induction

so, anyway, if you followed the gist of that, the implication is that there is some mechanism by which energy transits without a conductor, related to these electron threads/clouds and its not wave propagation like radio waves, i'm sure you get the implications of that

i have a theory that it is possible to create a coil based on odd-numbered nodes, lowest one being 5, that consists of 5 coils carrying current in one direction, and the other 5 in the other, bridged by resonant capacitors, and the coils catch all frequencies of magnetic flux changes and cause it to become a spinning magnetic field around the ferromagnetic core - an energy scavenger, and my theory is that due to the tuning used in the circuit and the ability of teh coils to catch even a small induction and start it spinning resonantly around the circuit, it accumulates this captured energy and acts like a magnetic battery - you probably also know about the phenomenon of hysteresis in magnets, it is a resistance to the reversal of the magnetic field, the solenoid has "inertia" in charging its field and discharging it, so it follows that if you can find some way to keep it moving around, ie, rotating on its polar axis, you can hold that energy until you tap it off at two points in the coil where the voltage is opposite, and put that captured energy to work

my idea is to use high permeability materials, special magnetic alloys like neodymium and rare earth but not aligned, but structured in a non-aligned manner so it can carry a higher flux density than an ordinary iron, nickel or cobalt core could

anyhow, the point of me mentioning that is that if the presence of material around these RNGs increases their frequency of triggering (reseeding) this probably is partly because even just of the increased density of matter, it would be interesting to see if the RNGs are also affected by high density materials like moving a giant chunk of steel next to them

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yeah the nearby distribution of matter could be affecting it. That's probably a more elegant solution than spooky action stuff.

I think the hard part of your idea is the adding and releasing of useful energy from the gyro. I think macro scale gyros have done this, but it sounded like you were proposing using an atom as the gyro - you'd have to confine it and then be able to interact with it, which I guess you could do with a magnetic field, but magnetic fields tend to interact with more than you want them to, so it would be tricky. And I think you'd have to assume some ambient level of magnetic interference, since everything with mass is vibrating - so you'd have to store enough energy and convert it efficiently enough to overcome that ambient interference while still being worth it.

For sure, the negativity of an electron cloud has some effect on the nucleus it surrounds. But is it a meaningful effect? Idk. What I know for sure does happen is the relative negativity of two electron clouds changes the density and position of nuclei in a molecule. This is called molecular geometry, and it plays a dominant role in molecular biology - those "s" and "p" configurations which I only vaguely recall. Khan academy teaches it really well, highly recommend. The lesson on aminos to peptides has it. Anyways.. Yeah, the orbital electron model everyone learns in highschool is wrong, and I flat out told my chemistry students back in China that the model I was teaching them was wrong. Their reactions were funny. It's useful, though. Whether electrons actually orbit is unknown, but what we can say is that they are found in "probability clouds" that you can draw like a few balloons sticking out of the nucleus - the balloons show the likelihood of finding the electron in that space, where the center of the balloon is the highest probability. When you draw your molecules, you have to think about how that cloud of negativity will repel other clouds of negativity, which pushes the clouds off to the sides when atoms are together in a molecule. This is fun shit, I might get out my biology book after this... Umm.. I think I was trying to see if your model fits into the bigger model that they usually don't teach us in school. Idk, did it?

The light turning on faster than the speed of light would allow could be because electricity doesn't actually travel the length of the wire. Its more like an abacus - electrons repel electrons, so if you put an electron on one end of the wire, it basically bumps the next electron, which bumps the next, etc. So, it could be (not saying it def is) that the information of doing one bump between electrons happens and is completed in a shorter time than it would take a photon to travel that distance. Just a guess, though.

yeah, your conception around the probability does fit what i'm saying because it's a probability density of finding an electron pair that has an orbit with an atom at inverse square decrease of probability with distance, but that also means as you add more mass, the probability of finding ONE from a billion atoms is a billion times higher, so the distance that you can go from matter increases with the square of the mass

but yes, the magnetic field and the current are inseparable in electrical conduction, you can't actually say one causes the other, or at least, they go both ways, you push electron in, you pop out magnetic flux, and vice versa, it has to do with the metal material, all metals push out a magnetic field when you push electrons into them, and that also supports my model that the magnetic field is a structured pattern of electron flux

the simple mass is mediated by neutral pairs, the magnetic field is chains of pairs of electrons flowing in opposite directions along the same path creating a linear pattern that we can detect as a magnetic field, and those electrons then crash into your conductor to induce current flow, which is the reverse transformation

i'd love to be able to develop the model more, but it's just a slightly different interpretation of empirical data

I think you should pursue it. All of our models or understandings are just interpretations of the data, and all are necessarily wrong in some way.

yeah, i hope to in the future

i have an idea for an EMF scavenger coil/circuit/magnetic battery and i also have another idea for a possible high efficiency impulse engine based on the EmDrive but using a dual chamber diamagnetic coated resonator around the final spiral coil of a tesla coil instead of using a microwave magnetron and an ugly conical resonator

i hope i get to have the resources to put these things together and start doing experiments... i think probably the coil is the safer one to start with, as i see it the tricky part of it will be tuning the capacitors so they create the rotating summative magnetic flux that acts as a battery by staying in constant self-reinforcing rotation motion