nostr:nprofile1qy28wumn8ghj7mn9waejuat50phjummwv5hszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9ekk7mt0wd68ytnsd9hxktcpz3mhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn99uqsuamnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dshsz9nhwden5te0dehhxarjv4kxjar9wvhx7un89uqzqcufhejfreakj05lx68vaz8u69zlqlqx35kphwhyy3aekhh588fjgupt3t I think you may have missed the mark re: Preston and Willie's talk about a 6102 threat. Doesn't seem like either of them was saying Bitcoin isn't safe to own in self custody -- after all, any trad-fi investment or even bank deposit is unsafe from a 6102 style threat, or if you wanna get European about it, a bail in. What they warn against is the 6102 threat to having PAPER bitcoin, because Coinbase, MSTR, Blackrock, etc are NOT going to do as you suggest -- they're going to roll over and hand over the keys.

The solution to that is and always has been self custody. And yea, it's also a good idea also to immediately move coins from the address you withdraw to for plausible deniability, and even better to coinjoin and/or lightning/submarine swap to add additional distance between your KYC and the current address.