The argument. I’ll skip over the last two sentences you wrote because that is just repeating what is in the article. The last sentence is just bizarre.
My issue is the argument that Epstein was directly involved in changing bitcoin into “useless money” and manipulated the narrative. It involves several assumptions that I think are ridiculous.
Doesnt claim directly, and the screen shot you posted clearly states 'potentially' and 'possible'.
Yes, I posted a screenshot of an article and the screenshot did not include the entire article in it so I am referencing things from the article which you did not read but wanted to argue about nonetheless. ✌️
Funny cuz I read it early in the morning and posted it here at the time as well. Long before your post, fucking shit talking faggot. Heaven fucking forbid you have actual conversation.
12 hours ago faggot.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=886x1920&blurhash=%5B17K%23d%7EWD%24.800.8%25gRP00IA%3Fbt7%24ex%5DxuMx4%3AIUWBkC%7EqIUM%7BWV4TIoNGIBTLIARjX8MHXSNGMx&x=19f7157b864fc2fd0bd6ed1cea29b7fcc720b67fa00a0c8ad772292059020c10
